Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ethn Dis. 2012 Summer;22(3):317–323.

Table 3.

Weight status and schoolmate-reported social integration, by race/ethnicity and sex

Number of Friends Linear Regression Estimates
Best Friend Reciprocated Friendship Logistic Regression
Estimates
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
Model 5
Model 6
Variables All Students Girls Boys All Students Girls Boys
White, not obese (ref.)
Obese −.54c
(.12)
−.45b
(.20)
−.60c
(.18)
21.86c
(.19)
22.02c
(.30)
21.72c
(.24)
Black −.44b
(.10)
−.50c
(.12)
−.39b
(.16)
−.56b
(.28)
−.74b
(.31)
−.37
(.33)
Hispanic −.29b
(.13)
−.46c
(.17)
−.09
(.18)
−.37
(.29)
−.56
(.36)
−.19
(.38)
Asian −.07
(.20)
−.54b
(.26)
.38
(.23)
−.21
(.37)
−.58
(.42)
.18
(.50)
Black, obese .71c
(.26)
.87c
(.32)
.39
(.37)
.59b
(.26)
1.10c
(.38)
.02
(.42)
Hispanic, obese .06
(.33)
.04
(.42)
.02
(.45)
.98b
(.43)
.93
(.62)
.94a
(.53)
Asian, obese .22
(.56)
.33
(.54)
.03
(.71)
.70
(.56)
−.28
(.69)
.61
(.64)
Constant .49
(.48)
.64
(.66)
.76
(.57)
3.50c
(.93)
5.94c
(1.01)
1.77
(1.14)

All models include controls for: other race, sex, parental education, foodstamp eligibility, years the respondent has attended current school, number of students in school, proportion of students of the same race/ethnicity in school, public/private school, region, and urbanicity.

Standard errors in parentheses.

a

significant at 10%.

b

significant at 5%.

c

significant at 1%.