Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 3;13:80. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-80

Table 1.

2009 comparisons of the College experience with community preceptorships identified by second-year medical students

Comment category Dominant comparison Sample quotes
Passive versus active learning
Colleges active, hands-on
“Preceptorships haven’t been much more than shadowing…College actually provides the opportunity to DO what I’m learning.”
Preceptorships shadowing
Comprehensive versus focused
Colleges comprehensive
“I learned a lot more specialized information in my preceptorship versus general information in [Colleges]. Preceptorships offer a better intro into the clinical world and short focused histories and physicals. Both were beneficial.”
Preceptorships specialized, focused
Structured versus unstructured
Colleges structured, rigorous, formal
“College is very ‘ideal’—follows guidelines/benchmarks…Preceptorships very quick and dirty version of what we learn in the Colleges.”
Preceptorships unstructured, spontaneous, relaxed
“Colleges are more formalized to cover all bases. In preceptorships, we get lots of exposure to bread & butter, but less variety. I think they are complementary.”
Specific skills areas
Colleges in physical exam and clinical reasoning
“Preceptorship was good for learning the mechanics and how you treat. Colleges good for interviewing, PE, OCP, and clinical reasoning.”
Preceptorships in techniques, procedures, treatment
Real life versus academic Colleges theoretical, academic
“Much more opportunity to practice and receive feedback through Colleges. Much more opportunity to learn specifics of clinical care, realities of practice and exposure to potential career options through preceptorships.”
Preceptorships real life