Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 6;8(6):e65468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065468

Table 3. Outcome measures for 30–33 week old omigapil and vehicle treated dy2J mice after 17.5 weeks show significant improvements in respiratory rate and fibrosis in dy2J 0.1 mg/kg omigapil treated mice.

Measurement dy2J vehicle dy2J Omigapil 0.1 mg dy2J Omigapil 1 mg Significantly different mean/medians
N Mean ± SD N Mean ± SD N Mean ± SD
%FS 7 34±1 7 33±3 7 34±1 NONE
%EF 7 64±2 7 63±2 7 64±2 NONE
Heart rate (BPM) 7 548±18 7 527±34 7 563±63 NONE
PA velocity (mm/s) 7 724±88 7 694±74 7 687±93 NONE
Ao velocity (mm/s) 7 924±105 7 917±106 7 942±73 NONE
E/A ratio 7 1.66±0.05 7 1.68±0.11 5 1.81±0.15 NONE
Horizontal activity* 7 619±111; 562 (487–748) 7 906±290; 778(682–1332) 7 696±258; 802 (203–1285) NONE
Total distance (cm)* 7 63±20; 70 (34–84) 7 163±110; 112(69–324) 7 128±97; 115 (15–296) NONE
Movement time(second)* 7 9±3; 10 (5–13) 7 23±14; 17 (11–45) 7 19±14; 18 (2–43) Vehicle vs. 0.1 mg (p = 0.026)
Rest time(second)* 7 591±3; 590 (587–595) 7 577±14; 583(555–589) 7 581±14; 582 (557–598) Vehicle vs. 0.1 mg (p = 0.026)
Vertical activity* 7 0±0; 0 (0–0) 7 0.1±0.4; 0 (0–1) 7 0±0; 0 (0–0) NONE
GSM forelimb (KGF) 7 0.090±0.010 7 0.084±0.012 7 0.086±0.010 NONE
Normalized GSM forelimb(KGF/kg) 7 4.239±0.483 7 4.318±0.603 7 4.321±0.621 NONE
Body weight (g) 7 21.4±2.6 7 19.5±2.3 7 20.3±3.2 NONE
Respiratory rate (bpm) 7 371±18 7 396±11 7 402±19 Vehicle vs. 0.1 mg (p = 0.026)Vehicle vs. 1 mg (p = 0.006)
Heart weight/BW 6 4.34±0.36 7 4.38±0.40 7 4.51±0.53 NONE
Spleen weight/BW 7 3.34±0.55 7 3.13±0.63 7 3.22±0.62 NONE
Gastroc Weight/BW 7 2.25±0.47 7 2.19±0.58 7 2.17±0.48 NONE
Soleus weight/BW 7 0.24±0.10 7 0.28±0.05 7 0.30±0.07 NONE
TA weight/BW 6 1.08±0.32 7 1.28±0.18 7 1.28±0.27 NONE
Hindlimb maximal force 7 223±31 7 220±41 7 223±46 NONE
Hindlimb specific force 7 184±28 7 193±27 7 177±22 NONE
% fibrosis – gastroc 7 20.6±2.6 7 16.4±2.0 7 17.2±3.3 Vehicle vs. 0.1 mg (p = 0.030)
% fibrosis - diaphragm 7 14.7±0.7 7 9.4±1.7 7 12.2±2.1 Vehicle vs. 0.1 mg (p<0.001)Vehicle vs. 1 mg (p = 0.032)0.1 mg vs. 1 mg (p = 0.013)
% area with degeneratingfibers – gastroc. 7 10.1±3.1 7 3.0±0.7 7 5.8±3.8 Vehicle vs. 0.1 mg (p = 0.001)Vehicle vs. 1 mg (p = 0.037)
% Centralized nucleifiber-gastroc* 7 36.4±3.2; 38.0 (30.5–39.5) 7 28.2±3.0; 27.3 (25.3–33.4) 7 29.0±4.9; 27.6 (22.7–36.1) Vehicle vs. 0.1 mg (p = 0.0120)Vehicle vs. 1 mg (p = 0.0376)
% Centralized nucleifiber-diaphragm* 7 13.6±1.5; 13.3 (12.0–16.6) 6 13.2±1.9; 12.9 (11.1–16.5) 7 12.8±1.5; 13.1 (10.9–14.9) NONE
% apoptosis nuclei per field* 3 36.3±4.1; 38.0 (31.5–39.2) 4 5.9±1.1; 5.6 (4.7–7.5) 4 4.5±1.7; 4.3 (2.9–6.9) NONE
*

Non-parametric comparison of medians; data expressed as mean ± SD; median (range).

Abbreviations: %FS – percent fractional shortening, %EF- percent ejection fraction, BPM- beats per minute, bpm – breaths per minute, SD – standard deviation, PA – pulmonary artery, AO – aortic, E/A – ratio of mitral valve E and A wave velocities, GSM – grip strength meter, BW- body weight, Gastroc – gastrocnemius, TA – tibialis anterior, KGF.