Table 1.
Availability of FFO and FVS within CTs according to poverty level and ethnic diversity (n = 247)
| Median availability of food outlets by quartile of poverty levela | Median availability of food outlets by quartile of ethnic diversityb | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food environment measure | Median Availability (IQR) | 1 Least poverty | 2 | 3 | 4 Most poverty | Pc | 1 Least diversity | 2 | 3 | 4 Most diversity | Pc |
| FFO relative availability (%) | 15.6 (11.4, 21.9) | 21.1 | 18.3 | 15.7 | 13.2 | <0.001 | 15.9 | 15.3 | 15.0 | 16.1 | 0.281 |
| FFO absolute availability (n/km2) | 1.1 (0.6, 1.9) | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | <0.001 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.005 |
| FVS relative availability (%) | 35.4 (26.7, 49.2) | 32.4 | 35.3 | 33.9 | 41.0 | 0.001 | 27.3 | 33.3 | 40.8 | 45.4 | <0.001 |
| FVS absolute availability (n/km2) | 1.9 (0.7, 3.7) | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.8 | <0.001 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 2.3 | <0.001 |
FFO fast-food outlets, FVS stores selling fresh fruits and vegetables, IQR interquartile range, CT census tract
aCutoff points for the lowest through the highest quartile of the percentage of residents in households below the low-income threshold are 15.8 %, 24.8 %, and 36.9 %, respectively
bCutoff points for the lowest through the highest quartile of the percentage of households speaking no official language are 12.7 %, 21.3 %, and 37.2 %
cp value of gradients in food outlets across levels