Table IV.
Genotype | Frequencya (%) | Phenotypea | FAb | 90% CIc | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caucasian | Asian | African American | Hispanic | ||||
*2*2 | 3.2 | 8.4 | 5.2 | 2 | PM | 0.005 | 0.002–0.008 |
*1*2 | 16.8 | 44.4 | 18.8 | 17.2 | IM | 0.30 | 0.25–0.36 |
*2*17 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 9.2 | 4.4 | Unknown | 0.80 | 0.50–1.19 |
*1*17 | 22.8 | 5.6 | 20.4 | 20.4 | EM | 1.59 | 1.24–1.85 |
*17*17 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 2.4 | UM | 2.03 | 1.28–2.62 |
FA fractional activity, CI confidence interval
aFrequencies and phenotypes as reported by Martis et al. (15). The frequencies of the reference *1*1 genotype reported in the study from Martis et al. were 49.2%, 36.4%, 38.4%, and 50.4% in Caucasians, Asians, African Americans, and Hispanics, respectively
bFA was calculated as the mean of the Bayesian posterior distribution
cCI was calculated as the range between the 5th and the 95th percentiles of the Bayesian posterior distribution