Table 1. Cone Identification Performance of Fully Automatic Methods Compared to the Gold Standard Across All 840 Images.

Method	% True Positive (95% CI)*	% False positive (95% CI)
Garrioch et al. 2012	94.5 (93.7, 95.2)	–
GTDP	99.0 (98.8, 99.2)	1.5 (1.2, 1.9)

*Statistically significant