Table 1. Cone Identification Performance of Fully Automatic Methods Compared to the Gold Standard Across All 840 Images.
Method | % True Positive (95% CI)* | % False positive (95% CI) |
---|---|---|
Garrioch et al. 2012 | 94.5 (93.7, 95.2) | – |
GTDP | 99.0 (98.8, 99.2) | 1.5 (1.2, 1.9) |
*Statistically significant