Table 2.
The research questions addressed and summarized findings regarding the three Phragmites lineages in the four study regions.
Chesapeake Bay | St Lawrence River | Utah | Gulf Coast | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Regional climate (www.worldclimate.com; data from nearby meteorological stations) | Jan max/min = 5 °C/−5 °C; July max/min = 31 °C/19 °C; Average rainfall = 105 cm; Baltimore, MD |
Jan max/min = −6 °C/−14.7 °C;
Julymax/min = 26 °C/16 °C; Average rainfall = 76 cm; Montreal, Trudeau Airport, QC |
Jan max/min = 3 °C/−7 °C; July max/min = 34 °C/17 °C; Average rainfall = 100–200 cm; Salt Lake City, UT; multiple nearby alpine sites for precipitation |
Jan. max/min = 16 °C/6 °C; July max/min = 32 °C/23 °C; Average rainfall = 158 cm; Plaquemines Parish, LA |
1. What is the regional and continental significance of the region's wetlands? | Fisheries including blue crab; migratory (Atlantic Flyway) and resident bird habitat | Drinking water; habitat for birds, fish, and other wildlife including many at-risk species | Critical migratory bird habitat on Pacific and Central Flyway, particularly for a region with a semiarid environment where wetlands are scarce | LA contains 40–45 % of the US's wetland habitats; an important stopover for birds on the Mississippi Flyway |
2. What are the known or perceived negative or positive impacts of P. australis invasion? | Negative impact: Aggressive spread; recent study documenting no native plant
diversity in P. australis stands Positive impact: May act as a sediment trap, buffering wetlands from sea-level rise |
Negative impact: Large monospecific stands raise concerns about consequences for
ecosystem function and wildlife habitat Positive impact: May be efficient at removing nutrients from agricultural run-off in ditches |
Negative impact: Perceived but not documented loss of diverse habitat for
migratory birds Positive impact: Unknown |
Negative impact: Can negatively affect bird habitats; with progressive invasion
of interior marshes, may cause loss of wildlife habitat Positive impact: Can help prevent marsh subsidence by capturing sediment and protecting interior marshes from tropical storm events and oil spills |
3. In what habitats do you find the different P. australis lineages? | Introduced: fresh to brackish wetlands; associated with developed and
agricultural land-use Native: rivers and creeks on eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay |
Introduced: ditches; newly exposed shores; and managed, disturbed or restored
wetlands Native: freshwater wetlands of the St Lawrence River (low marsh and areas with fewer human impacts) |
Introduced: fresh to brackish wetlands; on sandy beaches, in seasonally flooded
areas, and in semi-permanently flooded wetlands with emergent vegetation;
disturbed habitats such as ditches and roadsides Native: along rivers and streams, in seeps or near hot springs, and usually away from the major lakes and cities; widespread but not dense |
Introduced: mostly in Balize Delta, where it is the dominant vegetation in
wetlands with depths <1 m Berlandieri: on roadsides, waste areas/lowlands adjacent to estuarine wetlands, and most wet soils in general, but usually not in standing water; in Balize Delta - sporadically on spoil banks and elevated splays |
4. When and how did introduced P. australis first invade and spread? | Little documentation except rapid spread shown in Rhode River 1970–present day | Present for more than 96 years but spread rapidly with the creation of new habitat associated with the highway network in 1960–70s | First herbarium record in 1993; spread rapidly post-flooding of Great Salt Lake in 1980s | Introduced >90 years ago; arrival and spread likely related to major storm events and anthropogenic impacts from canal construction and dredging |
5. How fast is introduced P. australis expanding within the region? | Number of patches in Rhode River increased 40× and area covered increased 25× over a 40-year period | Mean dispersal events for the establishment of new patches estimated at 27–77 m year−1 in linear habitats (roadside and agricultural ditches) | No published data | No published data. Ongoing studies looking at annual growth and spread of individual clones with different water depths and salinity levels |
6. Is there evidence for multiple introductions of P. australis? | Most likely explanation given the high levels of genetic diversity | Most likely explanation given the high levels of genetic diversity | Most likely explanation given the high levels of genetic diversity | Yes, because there are multiple sublineages of introduced P. australis |
7. Do the mechanisms of spread differ among the lineages? | Introduced: seeds very important within and between watersheds, and even within
patches Native: no data |
Introduced: seeds more important than previously thought Native: no data |
Seeds much more important for introduced than native | Introduced: reliance on sexual reproduction varies between sublineages
Berlandieri spread is almost entirely vegetative |
8. Is introduced P. australis replacing the other lineages? | Not documented; co-occur only in some areas | Possibly at regional scale based on herbarium specimens; however monitoring at the boundary between native and introduced patches did not show clear replacement of one by the other | Not documented but historic native populations were found to still exist in a recent field survey; co-occur in a number of locations so native may get replaced in the near future | Not documented in the Balize delta (berlandieri does not play a significant role in deltaic wetlands); in competition study in a restoration, berlandieri was replaced by introduced P. australis |
9. What are the major vegetation types that P. australis is replacing? | Iva frutescens (marsh elder), Spartina patens (salt meadow cordgrass), Spartina cynosuroides (big cordgrass), Schoenoplectus americanus (common threesquare), Distichlis spicata (saltgrass), and Typha angustifolia (narrowleaf cattail) | Has been associated with habitats supporting species such as Typha spp. (cattails), Carex lacustris (hairy sedge), Sparganium eurycarpum (broadfruit bur-reed), and Calamagrostis canadensis (bluejoint). Introduced P. australis outcompetes Typha spp. in roadside habitats but no other systematic documentation of vegetation replacement | Schoenoplectus maritimus (alkali bulrush), S. acutus (hardstem bulrush), Typha spp. (cattails), and mudflat species such as Distichlis spicata (saltgrass) | In interior marshes of the Balize Delta, Schoenoplectus deltarum (delta bulrush), Sagittaria latifolia (broadleaf arrowhead), and Sagittaria platyphylla (delta arrowhead) are being invaded by introduced P. australis; but overall, there is a lack of historical data |