Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nanomedicine (Lond). 2013 Jan 3;8(9):1385–1395. doi: 10.2217/nnm.12.167

Figure 4. Histomorphometry of bone formation in empty hole, and around machined and nanotextured implants.

Figure 4

The bone formation area in an empty hole, and around machined and nanotextured implants showed no significant difference at 3 or 5 days post-surgery (one-way analysis of variance test). However, bone–implant contact in the nanotextured implants was significantly increased compared with that in the machined implants. Error bars show standard deviations.

*p < 0.05 by Mann–Whitney U test.