Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 13;22(6):1354–1361. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2720-x

Table 1.

Mean and SD for the sagittal spine parameters kyphotic and lordotic angles in degrees

Platform height (mm) Kyphotic angle (SD) Lordotic angle (SD)
Females Males Females Males
−60 47.36 (9.81) 46.42 (14.29) 44.68 (8.29) 35.43 (8.89)
−50 48.89 (10.36) 48.18 (14.15) 45.22 (8.62) 36.38 (8.45)
−40 49.98 (9.95) 50.38 (11.11) 45.08 (8.26) 36.62 (6.92)
−30 49.31 (9.07) 51.08 (10.98) 43.84 (8.25) 36.15 (6.41)
−20 50.54 (9.36) 52.37 (10.8) 44.13 (8.39) 34.93 (7.59)
−10 50.44 (9.63) 52.39 (9.36) 43.29 (8.06) 35.67 (7.4)
0 48.94 (8.51) 51.97 (10.26) 41.96 (8.42) 33.52 (8.04)
10 50.2 (8.49) 52.45 (10.33) 43.08 (8.37) 34.88 (7.44)
20 49.84 (8.64) 52.27 (9.68) 43.8 (8.05) 35.29 (7.16)
30 49.66 (8.92) 51.1 (10.44) 44.22 (7.82) 35.47 (7.71)
40 49.56 (9.04) 51.05 (10.53) 44.39 (7.09) 35.69 (6.72)
50 48.47 (9.72) 48.12 (13.38) 43.77 (7.46) 35.33 (7.02)
60 46.46 (9.94) 46.08 (14.23) 43.58 (7.27) 33.93 (7.27)

There were no significant differences between the different simulated platform heights and changes in these parameters, but we found differences between the lordotic angles of females and males with women having significant higher lordotic angles