Table 3.
Summary of studies evaluating rifampicin-loaded bone cement
Study | Cement type | Amount of antibiotics | Methods | Results | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anquita-Alonso et al. [1] | Simplex P (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA) | 2.5%/ 7.5%/ 15.0 % | Micrococcus luteus ATCC 9341 | 5 ± 2/147 ± 15/409 ± 46 ug/mL/hour of area under the curve, 4 ± 1/15 ± 2/31 ± 11 ug/mL of peak concentration | Rifampicin may be suitable for management of orthopaedic infections. |
Beeching et al. [2] | CMW1 (Depuy, Blackpool, UK) | 2.5 % | Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 | Not documented | Did not harden for several days. |
De Palma et al. [13] | CMW (Depuy, Blackpool, UK) | 1.2 g/40 g | Strength test | Not documented | The combination of rifampicin with CMW cement prevented complete polymerization of the cement. |
Current study | CMW 3 (Depuy, Blackpool, UK) | Rifampicin 1 g/2 g/4 g | Compressive strength, antibacterial activity | Strength could not be measured; partially effective antibacterial activity | Polymerization was prevented. |
ATCC = American Type Culture Collection.