Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2011 Sep;49(9):797–802. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318223c0ae

TABLE 1.

Panel Data Fixed-Effects Regression Analysis—Medicaid Policy and Rates and NH Hospice Usea

Variables of Interest Urban
(N=42,902)
Coef (95% CI)
Rural Adjacent to Urban
(N=11,364)
Coef (95% CI)
Rural Not Adjacent to Urban
(N=6,713)
Coef (95% CI)
Medicaid rate (a $10 increase)   0.41 (0.275, 0.553)*   0.11 (−0.144, 0.368) −0.37 (−0.676, −0.063)
Medicaid case-mix reimbursement (introduction)   2.14 (1.388, 2.896)*   2.06 (1.033, 3.095)*   1.74 (0.350, 3.126)
Secular Trends
  Per year   3.03 (2.864, 3.198)*   2.75 (2.392, 3.109)*   2.30 (1.914, 2.689)*
  Per year in state with any medicaid case-mix −0.11 (−0.267, 0.050) −0.04 (−0.370, 0.297)   0.12 (−0.251, 0.500)
  Per year in states with any hospice CON −0.45 (−0.616, −0.291)* −0.79 (−1.091, −0.488)* −1.16 (−1.547, −0.776)*
Case-mix admission severity (increase of 1 standard deviation) −0.58 (−0.820, −0.335)* −0.43 (−0.799, −0.053) −0.13 (−0.571, 0.305)
Hospice providers in county (increase of 1 provider)   0.08 (0.024, 0.134)§   1.06 (0.890, 1.227)*   1.82 (1.512, 2.132)*
a

Controlling for a nursing home’s occupancy rate; proportion of residents on Medicaid or Medicare, registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, and nursing assistant hours per patient day; presence of any special care unit; and at the county level, hospital and nursing home beds per 100 persons 65+ and physicians per 10,000 persons 65+.

Standardized.

*

P < 0.001.

P < 0.05.

§

P < 0.01.