Skip to main content
. 2013 May 23;2013:160295. doi: 10.1155/2013/160295

Table 2.

Comparison of intercalary reconstructions with massive allograft and vascularised fibula in the lower limb.

Author Patients Complications donor site Infection Fracture Nonunion Failure Reconstruction survival
Presented results 12 2 in 2 pat 2 (16.6%) 4 (33.3%) 4 (33.3%) 0 100% at ~3.5 years
Capanna et al. [30] 90 n.s 7 (7.5%) 12 (13.3%) 8 (8.8%) 6 (6.5%) 93.3% at ~9 years
Li et al. [32] 11 10 in 5 pat 0 0 1 (9%) 1 (9%) 90.9% at ~2.8 years
Jager et al. [33] 7 7 in 6 pat 1 (14.28%) 1 (14.28%) 2 (28.5%) 0 100% at ~3.7 years
Li et al. [31] 8 4 in 2 pat 0 0 2 (25%) 1 (12.5%) 87.5% at ~3.2 years
Innocenti et al. [34] 21 5 in 4 pat 1 (4.7%) 6 (28.5%) 2 (9.5%) 4 (19%) 80.9% at 10 years
Abed et al. [35] 25 6 in 5 pat 1 (4%) 9 (36%) 1 (4%) 5 (20%) 79% at 5 years
Moran et al. [36] 7 1 in 1 pat 0 2 (28.6%) 2 (28.5%) 0 100% at ~4.3 years
Bernd et al. [37] 16 1 in 1 pat 2 (12.5%) 1 (6.25%) 5 (31.3%) 1 (6.3%) 93.75% at ~5 years
Hennen et al. [38] 10 0 1 (10%) 0 1 (10%) 2 (20%) 80% at ~2.6 years
Ozaki et al. [39] 12 n.s 0 4 (33%) n.s 0 100% at ~2.6 years

n.s: not specified; Percentages in brackets.