Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Nov 30;21(2):160–170. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000150

Table 4. Studies that Tested System Interventions to Address Dimensions of Diagnostic Error.

Provider-patient Encounter
Perno, J. F., et al
(2005). Significant
reduction in delayed
diagnosis of injury
with implementation
of a pediatric trauma
service. Pediatr
Emerg Care, 21(6),
367-371.
UBA Designated pediatric
trauma response team
48 months Care team Unknown
care teams; A
total of 3265
patients were
included; no
patients were
excluded.
Incidence of
delayed
diagnosis of
injury (DDI)
among
pediatric
trauma
patients.
Y; speculated
reasons
included team
dedicated only

to trauma
Howard, J., et al.
(2006). Reducing
missed injuries at a
level II trauma center.
J Trauma Nurs, 13(3),
89-95.
Post-
test
only
Comprehensive
reevaluation (i.e.,
tertiary examination)
of trauma patients
within 24 hours of
admission
6 months A trauma
clinical nurse
specialist, 2
emergency
physicians,
and the
trauma
medical
director
4 healthcare
providers, 90
patients
Incidence of
missed
injuries
Y; tertiary
“repeat”
examination
and review of
all lab and
radiology
studies
Diagnostic Tests
Weatherburn, et al
(2000). The effect of
a picture archiving
and communications
system (PACS) on
diagnostic
performance in the
accident and
emergency
department. (J Accid
Emerg Med, 17(3),
180-184.)
CBA Implementation of
Picture Archiving and
Communications
System (PACS),
which acquires,
transports, and stores
radiographic images
electronically, with
accident and
emergency (A&E)
clinicians
Pre-PACS data
collection period
based on
conventional
film images: 3/
31/92 to
10/30/92; Post-
PACS data
collection
period: 4/1/96 to
10/30/96
Accident and
emergency
(A&E)
department.
# of A&E
attenders:
14,256
(film),
17,071
(PACS)
Misdiagnosis
(false
negative) rates
for adults and
children
Y; Speculated
reasons include
1) clinicians
could
manipulate soft
copy images in
PACS 2)
potential for
images to be
viewed
simultaneously
in A&E and
Radiology.pro
mpting more
consultations
Follow-up and Tracking
Singh, H., et al.
(2009). Improving
follow-up of
abnormal cancer
screens using
electronic health
records(BMC Med
Inform Decis Mak, 9,
49)
UBA Added a code to the
software
configuration that
links patients to their
PCP for tests ordered
by others.
10 months Primary care
physicians
One large
urban facility
and satellite
clinics; 490
alerts
Rates of
timely follow-
up of positive
FOBTs pre-
and post-
intervention
Y; improved
electronic
communication
of abnormal
test results
Poon, E. G., et al
(2002). Real-time
notification of
laboratory data
requested by users
through alphanumeric
pagers. (J Am Med
Inform Assoc, 9(3),
217-222).
Post-
test
only
Implementation of
Result Notification
via Alphanumeric
Pagers (ReNAP), an
application that
notifies clinicians of
patient laboratory
results via an
alphanumeric pager
once results are filed
into the patient
database.
12 months Inpatient and
clinic
physicians
During the 12
month period
between Feb
2000 and Jan
2001, 780
different
clinicians
used ReNAP;
a total of
22,775
requests were
made during
this time
period.
# of laboratory
notification
requests made,
user
satisfaction
scores
Y; improved
electronic
communication
of test results
Piva, E., et al. (2009).
Evaluation of
effectiveness of a
computerized
notification system
for reporting critical
values. (Am J Clin
Pathol, 131(3), 432-
441.)
UBA Implementation of a
computerized
notification system
for critical lab values
(email, text message,
video alert)
2 months Clinicians 14
Departments
(including
Emergency
Department)
in one large
hospital
Percentage of
successful
notifications
(acknowledge
d within 1
hour), time to
notification.
Y; improved
electronic
communication
of abnormal
test results

Key (study design):

  • UBA (Uncontrolled before and after study)

  • CBA (Controlled before and after study)

  • Post-test only (measures only taken after intervention was implemented)