Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr;28(4):473–479. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.02.009

Table 2.

Regression based Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement and estimated mean differences for step counts of each of three automated measures.

Device
Step-N-Tune A4L IDEEA
RA patients
Variation in bias, per step − 1.11x − 0.38x − 1.53x
Width of 95% LOA 169.74 52.90 225.00
Bias (95% LOA): 100 steps 110.59 (25.72 to 195.46) 6.12 (20.33 to 32.57) 127.84 (15.34 to 240.34)
150 steps 55.09 (− 29.78 to 139.96) − 12.88 (− 39.33 to 13.57) 51.34 (− 61.16 to 163.84)
200 steps − 0.41 (− 85.28 to 84.46) − 31.88 (− 58.33 to − 5.43) − 25.16 (137.66 to 87.34)



Controls
Variation in bias, per step 0.011x − 0.13x − 0.05x
Width of 95% LOA 22.64 44.16 61.52
Bias (95% LOA): 200 stepsa − 6.51 (− 17.83 to 4.81) − 20.75 (− 42.83 to 1.33) 21.47 (− 9.29 to 52.23)

Bias = estimated mean difference between gold standard and test device; LoA = limits of agreement; x = mean of gold standard and test device.

a

Estimates are only provided for controls at 200 steps because there were no observed data at lower step counts.