Table 5.

Predicting Impressions of Generalization Faces From Activation of the Happy Output Unit Controlling for Attractiveness, Babyfaceness, and Face Sex

Regression step	Predictor	Competence			Danger			Likeable			Expressive/loud
		B	(SE)	β	B	(SE)	β	B	(SE)	β	B	(SE)	β
Step 1	Intercept	2.90	(.163)		6.04	(.193)		1.46	(.160)		3.31	(.184)
	Korean (vs. White faces)	0.61	(.070)	.45***	−0.30	(.083)	−.19***	−0.14	(.069)	−.09*	−0.82	(.079)	−.50***
	Black (vs. White faces)	−0.21	(.069)	−.15**	0.37	(.082)	.22***	−.23	(.068)	−.15**	0.11	(.078)	.06
Step 2	Intercept	2.90	(.163)		6.03	(.191)		1.47	(.159)		3.32	(.184)
	Korean (vs. White faces)	0.60	(.070)	.44***	−0.28	(.082)	−.18**	−0.16	(.068)	−.11*	−0.84	(.079)	−.51***
	Black (vs. White faces)	−0.25	(.082)	−.17**	0.50	(.096)	.30***	−0.33	(.080)	−.22***	0.01	(.092)	.01
	Happy unit activation	0.002	(.002)	.04	−0.01	(.002)	−.14**	0.004	(.002)	.11*	0.004	(.002)	.09†
Step 3	Intercept	2.87	(.166)		6.06	(.195)		1.41	(.161)		3.30	(.187)
	Korean (vs. White faces)	0.61	(.075)	.45***	−0.28	(.088)	−.18**	−0.10	(.073)	−.07	−0.80	(.084)	−.49***
	Black (vs. White faces)	−0.27	(.088)	−.19**	0.55	(.103)	.33***	−0.31	(.085)	−.20***	0.08	(.099)	.04
	Happy unit activation	−0.001	(.003)	−.02	−0.003	(.004)	−.07	−0.001	(.003)	−.01	0.002	(.004)	.06
	Happy × Korean	0.002	(.005)	.02	0.000	(.005)	−.003	0.01	(.004)	.12*	0.01	(.005)	.08
	Happy × Black	0.01	(.004)	.08	−0.01	(.005)	−.10	0.01	(.004)	.10	−0.002	(.005)	−.02

Note. Face sex was coded 0 for male faces and 1 for female faces. Korean was coded 1 for Korean faces and 0 for others; Black was coded 1 for Black faces and 0 for others. Happy unit activation was centered.

^†p < .10.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.

^***p < .001.