Skip to main content
. 2013 May 25;2013:393460. doi: 10.1155/2013/393460

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Paw withdrawing latency (PWL) values in the indicated groups. The data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 12). Δ P < 0.01 versus sham-model group at the same time-point. P < 0.01 versus model group at the same time-point. *P < 0.01 versus electroacupuncture (EA) group at modeling PWL. # P < 0.01 versus WIN55212-2 group at modeling PWL. **P < 0.01 versus EA group at the same time-point. ## P < 0.01 versus WIN55212-2 group at the same time-point.