Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Res. 2013 Feb 25;28(3):271–298. doi: 10.1177/0743558413477195

Table 2.

Hierarchical Multiple Regression Analyses Predicting Strength of American Indian Ethnic Identity.

Model 1 Tribal and ethnic heritage b(β) Model 2 Reservation connections b(β) Model 3 Cultural and spiritual practices b(β) Model 4 Biculturalism b(β)
Intercept 4.583*** (0.00) 4.264*** (0.00) 3.910** (0.00)* 3.713*** (0.00)
Male vs. female –0.080 (–0.07) –0.075 (–0.06) –0.011 (–0.01) –0.041 (–0.04)
Age –0.144** (–0.20) –0.108* (–0.15) –0.124* (–0.18) –0.117* (–0.17)
Multitribal affiliation –0.047 (–0.03) –0.077 (–0.06) –0.121 (–0.09) –0.083 (–0.06)
Mother is American Indian 0.150 (0.09) 0.161 (0.11) 0.050 (0.03) –0.033 (–0.02)
Father is American Indian 0.429*** (0.33) 0.379** (0.30) 0.286* (0.23) 0.326** (0.26)
American Indian only identity –0.108 (–0.09) –0.138 (–0.12) –0.074 (–0.07) –0.045 (–0.04)
Years lived on reservation 0.007 (0.06) 0.008 (0.07) 0.013 (0.11)
Frequency visits reservation 0.032 (0.09) 0.022 (0.06) 0.001 (0.00)
Tribal language exposure and proficiency –0.117 (–0.16) –0.119 (–0.16)
American Indian spirituality 0.184* (0.26) 0.207** (0.30)
American Indian traditions/practices 0.168* (0.24) 0.175* (0.24)
Cultural orientation: Bicultural –0.274* (–0.18)
Cultural orientation: “White way” –0.514* (–0.18)
Cultural orientation: Neither AI nor White way 0.102 (0.08)
R 2 0.160 0.171 0.286 0.352
N 132 126 122 122
*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.