Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 10.
Published in final edited form as: Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press). 2011 Jul;57(3):4. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2011.0014

Table 2.

Father Subsample: Correlations among Variables

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1. Father alcohol/affective disordera .089 .152** −.019 −.114* .070 −.004 .064 .106* .156** .154** .056 .106*
2. Mother alcohol/affective disordera .100 .008 −.022 .104 .042 .109* .109* .074 .035 .183** .077
3. Father’s negative affect −.099 −.168** .148** −.062 .159** .103 .249** .164** .188** .122*
4. Father’s provision of support .376** −.055 −.118* −.260** −.190** −.355** −.228** −.149** −.142**
5. Father’s consistency of discipline −.086 −.099 −.337** −.267** −.378** −.248** −.242** −.231**
6. Major disruption in family environmentb −.004 .098 −.011 .079 .042 .065 .015
7. Adolescent sexc .148** .178** −.040 −.116* .082 .194**
8. Adolescent W1 internalizing .560** .640** .340** .558** .385**
9. Adolescent W3 internalizing .424** .495** .358** .476**
10. Adolescent W1 externalizing .552** .510** .325**
11. Adolescent W3 externalizing .250** .438**
12. Adolescent W1 negative emotionality .479**
13. Adolescent W3 negative emotionality

Mean 62
(18%)
meet
dx.
179
(52%)
meet
dx.
2.20 3.45 4.09 94
(27%)
yes
163
(47%)
female
2.14 2.06 1.65 1.69 2.79 2.79
SD .70 .87 .66 .73 .68 .48 .51 .71 .64
Range 1.2-4.7 1.0-5.0 2.1-5.0 1.0-4.3 1.0-4.5 1.0-3.5 1.0-4.0 1.3-4.9 1.0-4.7

Note. N=346,

**

p<.01,

*

p<.05.

All continuous variables are coded such that high scores indicate high levels of the variable.

a

−.5=No lifetime alcohol or affective disorder diagnosis, .5= Meets lifetime alcohol and/or affective disorder diagnosis.

b

−.5= No major disruption in the family environment, .5= Major disruption occurred within past 3 months.

c

−.5=Males, .5=Females.