Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 19;368(1614):20120203. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0203

Table 1.

Comparison of substitution rates between transmission chains. Strict, strict molecular clock; relaxed, exponential relaxed molecular clock; constant, constant size; exponential, exponential growth; 95% CIs shown in brackets.

dataset molecular clock model coalescent model marginal mean log likelihood substitution rate (×10−5 mutations per nucleotide per day)
cow-to-cow (chain A) strict constant −11493.09 2.27 (0.770–3.90)
strict exponential −11492.27 2.26 (0.728–3.91)
relaxed exponential −11493.55 1.94 (0.205–3.78)
relaxed constant −11494.03 1.97 (0.313–3.76)
cow-to-cow (chain B) strict constant −11605.52 2.86 (1.32–4.43)
strict exponential −11603.95 2.91 (1.41–4.57)
relaxed exponential −11598.06 3.21 (1.42–5.28)
relaxed constant −11600.19 3.05 (1.15–4.95)
herd-to-herd (2007) strict constant −11650.38 2.51 (1.43–3.74)
strict exponential −11647.06 2.61 (1.45–3.87)
relaxed exponential −11640.31 3.09 (1.59–4.82)
relaxed constant −11644.21 2.97 (1.48–4.65)
herd-to-herd (2001)a relaxed exponential 2.26 (1.75–2.8)
herd-to-herd (2001)b relaxed constant 2.08 (0.574–3.51)

aAdapted from [10].

bAdapted from [11].