Table 2.
DIO | P. balsamifera 125 mg/kg | P. balsamifera 250 mg/kg | DIO | Salicortin 12.5 mg/kg |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glucose (mmol/L) | 135 ± 14† | 105 ± 8 | 121 ± 10 | 121 ± 6† | 114 ± 6 |
Insulin (ng/mL) | 3056 ± 1074† | 450 ± 238* | 832 ± 423 (P = 0.052) |
1035 ± 150† | 272 ± 62§ |
Leptin (ng/mL) | 211 ± 28† | 108 ± 18* | 145 ± 9 (P = 0.051) |
246 ± 19† | 197 ± 13§ |
Adiponectin (μg/mL) | 70 ± 3† | 78 ± 10 | 82 ± 5 (P = 0.054) |
97 ± 5 | 101 ± 6 |
Leptin/adiponectin ratio | 304 ± 37† | 138 ± 16* | 181 ± 16* | 248 ± 12† | 196 ± 18§ |
TG (mmol/L) | 99 ± 8 | 80 ± 10 | 82 ± 8 | 118 ± 10 | 106 ± 14 |
LDL (mmol/L) | 391 ± 31† | 355 ± 37 | 307 ± 42 | 344 ± 20† | 207 ± 22§ |
HDL (mmol/L) | 141 ± 8† | 112 ± 17 | 125 ± 8 | 157 ± 10† | 137 ± 7 |
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 180 ± 9† | 152 ± 14 | 151 ± 12 | 203 ± 11† | 151 ± 7§ |
ALT (U/L) | 281 ± 39† | 229 ± 47 | 271 ± 77 | 341 ± 123† | 157 ± 27 |
AST (U/L) | 172 ± 30† | 153 ± 22 | 137 ± 22 | 163 ± 27† | 86 ± 5§ |
Creatinine (U/L) | 184 ± 50 | 491 ± 160 | 557 ± 138 | 276 ± 113 | 136 ± 30 |
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | 115 ± 20 | 85 ± 15 | 100 ± 9 | 106 ± 9 | 88 ± 17 |
LDH (U/L) | 341 ± 83† | 137 ± 16§ | 193 ± 61 | 376 ± 156† | 154 ± 38 |
Measurements were obtained after 16 weeks of treatment with either standard diet (Chow), HFD (DIO), and for the last 8 of the 16 weeks with HFD in combination with P. balsamifera at 125 or 250 mg/kg, or with the active salicortin at 12.5 mg/kg. All values are expressed as a percentage of their respective Chow controls (reference set at 100%) and represent the mean ± SEM. The number of animals for each group for the P. balsamifera protocol was: CHOW (n = 12); DIO (n = 8); P. balsamifera 125 (n = 5); P. balsamifera 250 (n = 7); and for the salicortin protocol: CHOW (n = 12); DIO (n = 7); salicortin (n = 9). †denotes DIO significantly different as compared to Chow (unpaired Student's t test; P < 0.05). *denotes significantly different as compared to respective DIO (one way ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc test; P < 0.05). §denotes significantly different as compared to respective DIO (unpaired Student's t test; P < 0.05).