Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 11.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Apr 23;17(10):1313–1318. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.011

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Figures showing the main effects of proximal femur shape variation in the Modes 3, 5 and 9. Each figure shows the average (—), +2 SD (- - - -) and −2 SD (..) shapes in each of these modes. In each mode the +2 SD outline is associated with a higher risk of incident RHOA. (A) Mode 3: +2 SD shape associated with variations in the relative size of femoral head and neck length. (B) Mode 5: +2 SD shape associated with variations in relative size and width of femoral neck and greater trochanter. (C) +2 SD shape associated with variations in relative size of both femoral head and greater trochanter (see text for details).