. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 11.

Published in final edited form as: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Apr 23;17(10):1313–1318. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.011

Table II.

Percentage of variance in the proximal femur shape explained by each mode of variation, and association with incident RHOA

Mode	% of variance explained (N = 351)	Controls (N = 249)		Cases (N = 102)		P-value
Mode	% of variance explained (N = 351)	Adjusted OR	95% CI	Adjusted OR	95% CI	P-value
Mode 1	54.4	1.0	–	1.24	0.92–1.68	0.164
Mode 2⁺	18.2	1.0	–	0.58	0.39–0.85	0.006
Mode 3^*	8.9	1.0	–	1.73	1.25–2.39	<0.001
Mode 4	5.3	1.0	–	0.99	0.74–1.34	0.961
Mode 5^*	3.3	1.0	–	2.31	1.63–3.28	<0.001
Mode 6⁺	1.5	1.0	–	0.67	0.50–0.91	0.010
Mode 7⁺	1.1	1.0	–	0.74	0.55–0.99	0.043
Mode 8⁺	0.9	1.0	–	0.67	0.51–0.90	0.007
Mode 9^*	0.8	1.0	–	1.81	1.32–2.49	<0.001
Mode 10	0.7	1.0	–	0.99	0.72–1.37	0.96

Significant at P < 0.005;

⁺

not significant at P < 0.005 using Bonferroni correction. Adjusted for age, height and total hip BMD.