Table 3.

HLM estimates of daily intragroup contact predicting daily private regard moderated by stable ethnic identity centrality and school ethnic composition.

		B	SE
Daily Private Regard	B00, G000	1.31	0.62
Stable Private Regard	B01, G010	0.80	0.23
Stable Centrality	B02, G020	−0.43	0.18
Self-reported School Comp.	B03, G030	0.36	0.95
Self-reported Neigh. Comp.	B04, G040	0.35	0.80
Day of Study	B10, G100	−0.03	0.02
Day Type	B20, G200	0.04	0.12
Daily Centrality	B30, G300	0.62***	0.08
Contact – Interacted	B40, G400	0.26	0.33
Stable Private Regard	B41, G410	−0.47	0.75
DOE-reported School Comp	B41, G411	0.70	1.08
Stable Centrality	B42, G420	0.61	0.62
DOE-reported School Comp	B42, G421	−1.03	0.90
Self-reported School Comp.	B43, B430	−0.30	0.52
Self-reported Neigh. Comp.	B44, B440	−0.04	0.28
Contact – Surrounded	B50, G500	−0.38	0.31
Stable Private Regard	B51, G510	1.40	0.79
DOE-reported School Comp	B51, G511	−2.17	1.15
Stable Centrality	B52, G520	−1.39*	0.66
DOE-reported School Comp	B52, G521	2.38*	0.97
Self-reported School Comp.	B53, G530	0.45	0.40
Self-reported Neigh. Comp.	B54, G540	0.04	0.31

Note:

+ p < .10,

^*p < .05,

** p < .01,

^***p < .001.

Using methods described in Xu (2003) the R² for the above model is estimated to be 0.37; such that 37% of the observed variability in daily private regard is explained by the variables included in the model.