Table 4.

HLM estimates of previous day intragroup contact predicting daily private regard moderated by stable ethnic identity centrality and school ethnic composition

		B	SE
Daily Private Regard, d	B00, G000	−0.68	0.85
Stable Private Regard	B01, G010	0.42	0.40
Stable Centrality	B02, G020	−0.16	0.34
Self-reported School Comp.	B03, G030	1.35	1.12
Self-reported Neigh. Comp.	B04, G040	1.05	1.39
Day of Study	B10, G100	−0.01	0.03
Day Type	B20, G200	0.09	0.11
Daily Centrality, d	B30, G300	0.59**	0.10
Contact – Same Day Interacted, d	B40, G400	0.03	0.08
Contact – Same Day Surrounded, d	B50, G500	−0.08	0.06
Contact –Previous Day Interacted, d-1	B60, G600	0.17	0.31
Stable Private Regard	B61, G610	0.06	0.80
DOE-reported School Comp	B61, G611	0.05	1.17
Stable Centrality	B62, G620	0.76	0.69
DOE-reported School Comp	B61, G611	−1.20	1.01
Self-reported School Comp.	B63, G630	−0.24	0.44
Self-reported Neigh. Comp.	B64, G640	−0.08	0.29
Contact – Previous Day Surrounded, d-1	B70, G700	−0.01	0.32
Stable Private Regard	B71, G710	0.59	0.85
DOE-reported School Comp	B71, G711	−1.04	1.24
Stable Centrality	B72, G720	−2.70***	0.79
DOE-reported School Comp	B72, G721	4.16***	1.18
Self-reported School Comp.	B73, G730	0.26	0.55
Self-reported Neigh. Comp.	B74, G740	−0.10	0.34
Previous Day Private Regard, d-1	B80, G800	0.23	0.14

Note:

+ p < .10,

* p < .05,

^**p < .01,

^***p < .001.

Using methods described in Xu (2003) the R² for the above model is estimated to be 0.49; such that 49% of the observed variability in daily private regard is explained by the variables included in the model.