Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2013 Apr 1;216(2):118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.03.016

Fig. 3. Comparison of the proteome coverage among the unfractionated preparation and the ERLIC and SCX fractionated preparations.

Fig. 3

(A) and (B) Comparison of the numbers of unique proteins and peptides. Unfractionated (Blue bar), ERLIC (Red bar) and SCX (Green bar). (A) shows data from one of the representative experiment. ERLIC and SCX fractionations increased the number of unique proteins or peptides identified by more than 140% and 150%, respectively (* p≤ 0.05). (C) and (D) Annotated localizations of the proteins identified. Unfractionated (Blue bar), ERLIC (Red bar) and SCX (Green bar). (D) shows data from one of the representative experiment. Subcellular localization annotation: Nucleus (Blue); Cytoplasm (Red); Extracellular Space (Green); Plasma Membrane (Purple); Unknown (Orange).