Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cortex. 2012 Sep 5;49(6):1648–1667. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.009

Table 5.

Percent of famous faces that were correctly named on re-presentation following successful identification with the MC paradigm, and comparison of the same groups on working memory tasks.

Groups Left TLE(n = 10)
Right TLE (n = 12)
Healthy comparison group (n = 10)
Statistical differences
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
% of famous faces named on re-presentation 33.3% 22.4 92.2% 10.3 98.9% 3.3 χ2 = 357.6, p < .001
WAIS-III digit span SS = 8.2 3.3 SS = 8.7 3.1 N/A t = .07, n.s.
WAIS-III letter number sequencing SS = 9.4 3.4 SS = 10.2 2.4 N/A t = .21, n.s.
Presurgical left TLE (n = 5)
Presurgical right TLE (n = 7)
Healthy comparison group (n = 10)
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
% of famous faces named on re-presentation 49.0% 29.0 93.0% 6.9 98.9% 3.3 χ2 = 227.8, p < .001
Postsurgical left TLE (n = 5)
Postsurgical right TLE (n = 5)
Healthy comparison group (n = 10)
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
% of famous faces named on re-presentation 26.0% 14.7 91.0% 8.4 98.9% 3.3 χ2 = 218.8, p < .001

Note. Statistical comparisons were made using the Kruskal–Wallis Test or an ANOVA as appropriate. Transformed proportions derived from the percent accuracy scores were used for all percentages. A weighting factor was required for this analysis as some healthy control subjects did not have 20 re-presented famous faces. Therefore, the N size for this variable is based on the number of observations rather than number of subjects. n.s. = non-significant.