Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Virol Methods. 2013 Apr 26;192(0):28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.04.013

Figure 4. Comparison of Physical and Biological Titration Methods.

Figure 4

A single stock of purified GFP-expressing FG-Ad vector was titered by five different methods. Each bar indicates the mean of multiple assays ± standard deviation (OD260 N=6, TCID50 N=5, GFP Transduction N=5, VG N=8, IGU N=27). Statistical significance was determined by post-ANOVA Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. * indicates statistical significance with P < 0.05.