Table 3.
Means for behavioral study outcomes, one-way ANOVA
| Targeted behaviors: perceived change | H@H group (n = 44) |
Control group (n = 41) |
F statistic | p value | ESa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (SD) | M (SD) | ||||
| Made effort to enhance relationship | |||||
| Post intervention | 3.05 (0.91) | 2.37 (0.97) | 11.08 | <0.01* | 0.37 |
| 3-months post intervention | 3.11 (0.78) | 2.46 (0.75) | 15.32 | <0.01* | 0.43 |
| Stated clear expectations | |||||
| Post intervention | 2.61 (0.99) | 2.07 (1.06) | 5.90 | 0.02* | 0.27 |
| 3-months post intervention | 2.70 (1.00) | 2.02 (0.94) | 10.73 | <0.01* | 0.36 |
| Gave reasonable consequences | |||||
| Post intervention | 3.05 (0.94) | 2.46 (1.19) | 6.34 | 0.01* | 0.28 |
| 3-months post intervention | 2.98 (0.90) | 2.54 (1.03) | 4.43 | 0.04* | 0.23 |
| Stayed calm when child argued | |||||
| Post intervention | 3.02 (0.76) | 2.07 (1.08) | 22.13 | <0.01* | 0.52 |
| 3-months post intervention | 2.98 (1.09) | 2.71 (1.03) | 1.37 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Negotiated good behavior | |||||
| Post intervention | 3.05 (0.89) | 2.27 (1.16) | 12.10 | <0.01* | 0.38 |
| 3-months post intervention | 2.95 (1.10) | 2.54 (1.08) | 3.14 | 0.08 | 0.37 |
H@H group Harmony@Home group
* The result is statistically significant at p < 0.05
a ES Cohen’s effect size index f: 0.10 = small, 0.25 = medium, 0.40 = large