Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 24;22(5):603–613. doi: 10.1007/s10826-012-9614-0

Table 3.

Means for behavioral study outcomes, one-way ANOVA

Targeted behaviors: perceived change H@H group
(n = 44)
Control group
(n = 41)
F statistic p value ESa
M (SD) M (SD)
Made effort to enhance relationship
 Post intervention 3.05 (0.91) 2.37 (0.97) 11.08 <0.01* 0.37
 3-months post intervention 3.11 (0.78) 2.46 (0.75) 15.32 <0.01* 0.43
Stated clear expectations
 Post intervention 2.61 (0.99) 2.07 (1.06) 5.90 0.02* 0.27
 3-months post intervention 2.70 (1.00) 2.02 (0.94) 10.73 <0.01* 0.36
Gave reasonable consequences
 Post intervention 3.05 (0.94) 2.46 (1.19) 6.34 0.01* 0.28
 3-months post intervention 2.98 (0.90) 2.54 (1.03) 4.43 0.04* 0.23
Stayed calm when child argued
 Post intervention 3.02 (0.76) 2.07 (1.08) 22.13 <0.01* 0.52
 3-months post intervention 2.98 (1.09) 2.71 (1.03) 1.37 0.15 0.13
Negotiated good behavior
 Post intervention 3.05 (0.89) 2.27 (1.16) 12.10 <0.01* 0.38
 3-months post intervention 2.95 (1.10) 2.54 (1.08) 3.14 0.08 0.37

H@H group Harmony@Home group

* The result is statistically significant at p < 0.05

a ES Cohen’s effect size index f: 0.10 = small, 0.25 = medium, 0.40 = large