Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 4;27(6):469–478. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0077-7

Table 2.

Mean efficacy assessments at baseline and endpoint (week 24, LOCF; ITT population)

Outcome measure N Baselinea Endpoint change from baselinea LSMD [95 % CI] p-Value
SIB
 Memantine ER 332 76.8 ± 17.5 2.7 ± 11.2 2.6 [1.0, 4.2] 0.001
 Placebo 327 75.2 ± 19.3 0.3 ± 11.5
CIBIC-Plusb
 Memantine ER 333 4.5 ± 0.87 3.8 ± 1.2b N/A 0.008
 Placebo 328 4.5 ± 0.82 4.1 ± 1.2b
ADCS–ADL19
 Memantine ER 331 33.1 ± 11.1 −0.7 ± 6.9 0.7 [−0.3, 1.8] 0.177
 Placebo 328 32.8 ± 11.0 −1.3 ± 7.7
NPI
 Memantine ER 318 17.2 ± 15.6 −4.3 ± 14.6 −2.7 [−4.5, −0.8] 0.005
 Placebo 321 16.5 ± 15.4 −1.6 ± 12.7
VFT
 Memantine ER 330 5.8 ± 3.8 0.3 ± 2.8 0.5 [0.2, 0.9] 0.004
 Placebo 326 5.7 ± 3.7 −0.3 ± 2.5

aMean ± standard deviation

bCIBIC-Plus is a categorical measure of change. Values shown for baseline are the Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Severity; endpoint values are final CIBIC-Plus scores. p-Value is from a Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test

ADCS–ADL 19 19-item Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living, CI confidence interval, CIBIC-Plus Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input, ER extended-release formulation (28 mg), ITT intent-to-treat, LOCF last observation carried forward, LSMD least squares mean difference, N/A not applicable, NPI Neuropsychiatric Inventory, SIB Severe Impairment Battery, VFT verbal fluency test