Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Apr 5;22(6):1007–1014. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0085

Table 2.

Negative and Positive Correlations between vitamin D and upper gastrointestinal cancer reported in nine studies.

Negative Positive
EC EAC EGJAC ESCC GC GNCA EC EAC ESCC ESCD GC GCA
Tran et al 2012 0.82a, 0.59b 0.83a, 0.55b 0.94a, 0.91b
Mulholland 2011 1.99
Abnet et al 2010 No correlation No correlation
Chen et al 2010 0.42c, 0.89d 0.62c, 0.99d 1.12e, 1.00f 1.08e, 0.92f
Lipworth et al 2009 0.84g, 0.58h
Chen et al 2007 0.98 1.07 1.03
Abnet et al 2007a 1.86
Giovannucci et al 2006 0.37 0.58
Boscoe and Schymura 2006 1.27i, 1.36j

EAC = Esophageal Adenocarcinoma; EC = Esophageal Cancer; EGJAC = Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma; ESCC = Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; GC = Gastric Cancer

Statistically significant values are bolded. The absence of a value in a field indicates this statistic was not evaluated by the study.

a

This OR is for each increase in 107 J/m2 of cumulative ambient UVB exposure. See text for further explanation.

b

This OR is for highest v. lowest tertile. See text for further explanation.

c

Rural incidence ratio

d

Rural mortality ratio

e

Urban incidence ratio

f

Urban mortality ratio

g

This OR is for vitamin D status reported as a continuous variable.

h

This OR is with respect to the lowest tertile of vitamin D status.

i

Incidence ratio

j

Mortality ratio