Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e66172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066172

Table 2. Protective capacity of the SPI1-lon, SPI1-lon-fliC and SPI1-lon-fliC-rcsA mutants after oral-oral vaccination and oral or intravenous challenge in chickens.

day 42 of life Challenge 4 DPI 14 DPI
Vaccination Liver spleen caecum liver spleen caecum
SPI1-lon::Cm oral 1/6# 2/6 5/6& 1/6 0/6 3/6
SPI1-lon::Cm -fliC 1/6 0/6 0/6 0/6 1/6 2/6
SPI1-lon::Cm-fliC-rcsB::Kan 4/6 3/6 6/6& 0/6 0/6 3/6
non-vaccinated 2/6 2/6 6/6& 4/6 4/6 6/6
SPI1-lon::Cm intravenous 3.94±0.47* 5.20±0.24* 6/6 3/6 2.40±1.41* 2/6
SPI1-lon::Cm -fliC 2.92±1.37* 4.89±0.72* 6/6 5/6 3.29±1.07 2/6
SPI1-lon::Cm-fliC-rcsB::Kan 3.97±0.20* 5.34±0.25* 6/6 6/6 3.58±0.31* 4/6
non-vaccinated 4.71±0.39 6.68±0.42 6/6 5/5 4.16±0.38 5/5
#

number of positive chickens/number of tested.

*

t-test different from the non-vaccinated control chickens at P<0.05.

&

χ2 test different from the chickens vaccinated with the SPI1-lon-fliC mutant in caecum at 4 DPI (P<0.05).