Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e66172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066172

Table 3. Protective capacity of the SPI1-lon and SPI1-lon-fliC mutants after oral-oral-intravenous vaccination, followed by oral or intravenous challenge in chickens.

4 DPV$ 14 DPV day 62of lifechallen. 4 DPI 14 DPI
vaccination liver spleen caecum Liver spleen caecum liver spleen caecum liver spleen caecum
SPI1-lon 4/6# 4.42±0.36 0/6 2/6 5/6 0/6 Oral 2/6 5/6 1/6* 0/6 2/6 0/6
SPI1-lon-fliC 4/6 4.21±0.48 0/6 1/6 6/6 0/6 0/6* 3/6 2/6 0/5 1/5 0/5
non-vaccinated n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 6/6 6/6 6/6 2/6 3/6 0/6
SPI1-lon i.v 1.94±0.94& 4.27±0.38& 4/6 4/6 2.25±1.26& 0/6
SPI1-lon-fliC 2.26±0.89& 4.49±0.41& 0/6* 1/6* 2.17±1.19& 0/6
non-vaccinated 4.73±0.70 6.50±0.56 5/6 6/6 4.06±0.67 1/6
$

DPV, days post intravenous vaccination.

#

number of positive chickens/number of tested.

*

χ2 test different from the non-vaccinated control chickens at P<0.05.

&

t-test different from the non-vaccinated control chickens at P<0.05.