Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 17;8(5):546–555. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss032

Table 4.

Individual differences in response to S-P trials of the VV-SORP-T

Conditions Predictors Direction of correlation Regions kP<0.005 kSVC Z x y z
S-P > Fixation S-P Survey + R precuneus 85 3.92 18 −42 60
+ L middle frontal gyrus (wm) 91 3.60 −22 40 18
+ L post-central gyrus 143 3.44 −34 −32 58
+ L superior temporal gyrus 107 3.26 −48 −14 34
R amygdala–parahippocampal gyrus 148 3.67 36 0 −20
R temporal pole 119 3.53 58 −6 −18
  • S-P

  • PA

+ R temporal pole 102 4.51 62 −6 −16
+ DMPFC 237 87a 3.84 6 50 20
+ L-TPJ (wm) 104 3.75 −36 −60 14
+ L-TPJ 102 48b 3.69 −50 −54 18
+ L posterior insula (wm) 104 3.65 −24 −22 12
+ L post-central gyrus 117 3.65 14 −24 66
+ L-superior frontal gyrus 163 3.51 14 40 52
No significant results
S-P > O-P S-P Survey + No significant results
R-DMPFC 88 18c 4.38 14 30 46
L-TPJ 74 22d 4.28 −54 −56 32
VMPFC 456 48e 4.26 −4 32 −26
R-IFG 118 3.97 38 58 −2
L-IFG 145 3.81 −36 50 −4
R-temporal pole 124 3.37 40 0 −20
L-IFG 91 3.36 −20 40 −14
  • S-P

  • PA

+ VMPFC 73 20f 4.28 −2 30 −24
+ DMPFC 229 35g 4.10 12 32 46
+ L-TPJ 108 31h 4.08 −52 −60 16
+ L-IFG 169 4.03 −20 24 −16
+ R-caudate 159 3.75 10 14 4
+ Precuneus 186 3.70 −2 −60 38
+ L-cerebellum 75 3.34 −16 −62 −34
+ VMPFC 95 2.93 −8 52 −20

(wm), white matter.

aAt ROI 2, 55, 17, Yoshimura et al., 2009.

bAt ROI −52, −56, 22, van Overwalle, 2009.

cAt ROI 6, 27, 42, Lemogne et al., 2011.

dTwo clusters within ROI −52, −56, 22, van Overwalle, 2009.

eAt ROI −3, 36, −18, Phan et al., 2004.

fAt ROI −3, 36, −18, Phan et al., 2004.

gAt ROI 6, 27, 42, Lemogne et al., 2011.

hAt ROI −52, −56, 22, van Overwalle, 2009.