Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 14.
Published in final edited form as: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009 Jan;85(1):42–51. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20571

Table 1.

Study participants by cleft type and population

Population Phenotype Number of triads
Comments
nonsyndromic syndromic
Danishe CPOa 68 15 223 three-generation
families (mother, father,
child, and mother’s
parents)
CLb 64 5
CLPc 89 6

Norwegian CPO 100 67 426 complete triads and
52 triads with a missing
parent
CL 112 15
CLP 152 32
Controld 516 326 dyads and 190
triads
a

CPO= Cleft Palate Only

b

CL= Cleft Lip only

c

CLP= Cleft Lip and cleft Palate

d

Control fathers were first asked to provide a swab sample only after November 1998, two years after the onset of the study. Hence, a substantial proportion of the control families initially recruited consist of only mother-child dyads.

e

Subphenotype information for one Danish case was not available.