Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 28;21(7):779–783. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.242

Table 2. Variable selection results.

Genomic regiona Locationb Phenotype SNPs Estimate Individual P-valuec Overall P-valued
F12 and GRK6 5q33-35 aPTT rs2545801 rs1801020 −0.02950 −0.022793 0.041 0.1303 < 2.2 × 10−16
HRG and KNG1 3q27 aPTT rs1042445 0.010413 0.00704 < 2.2 × 10−16
      rs2062632 0.007951 0.02904  
      rs2228243 0.018532 2.34 × 10−05  
      rs710446 −0.021965 2.96 × 10−12  
      rs9898 −0.014528 6.23 × 10−05  
KLKB1 4q35 aPTT rs4253304 0.015523 6.15 × 10−08 6.15 × 10−08
ABO 9q34 aPTT rs657152 0.015269 0.000263 1.269 × 10−10
      rs651007 0.006843 0.154113  
F5 and SLC19A2 1q23 APC resistance rs6025 0.28882 <2 × 10−16 < 2.2 × 10−16
HRG 3q27 APC resistance rs16860992 −0.116523 0.043113 2.2 × 10−16
      rs2228243 −0.088207 0.125584  
      rs9898 −0.014962 0.000618  
a

Genomic regions are represented by gene names.

b

Location is cytogenetic location.

c

The individual P-value gives an indication of the statistical independence of a SNP from others included in the model.

d

The overall P-value indicates the strength of the combined evidence against the null hypothesis when all SNPs are included.

For each SNP in a genomic region the estimate gives an indication of the independent effect of that SNP on the trait. Akaike Information Criterion was used to identify SNPs with a significant independent contribution to the phenotype of interest in a step-wise multiple regression of significantly associated SNPs in each genomic region.