Table 2. The association between chlamydia diagnosis and ethnicity estimated by logistic regression analysis among heterosexual participants attending the sexually transmitted infections outpatient clinic, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, in 2010.
| OR (95% CI) | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate | 1.70 (1.21–2.39) | 0.002 | |
| Adjusted for age and gendera | 1.64 (1.16–2.31) | 0.005 | |
| Adjusted for age, gender and sexual risk behaviour a,b,c | 1.48 (1.00–2.18) | 0.050 | |
| Adjusted for age, gender, education, and neighbourhood a , d | 1.08 (0.71–1.64) | 0.730 | |
| Adjusted for age, gender, sexual risk behaviour, ethnic mixing, education and neighbourhood a,b,c,d | 0.97 (0.61–1.54) | 0.910 | |
OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval
Continuous variables like age, number of partners in the preceding year, and average partnership duration were modelled as a restricted cubic spline with knots on the 2.5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 97 5th percentiles;
b Sexual risk behaviour included the following covariates: number of partners in the preceding year, average partnership duration, concurrency, inconsistent or absent condom use with a steady partner, inconsistent or absent condom use with a casual partner, and ethnic mixing;
c Log transformations were used to model the number of partners in the preceding year and the average partnership duration;
Education and neighbourhood were used as markers of socio-economic status.