Table 4.
Differences in Vaginal Sexual Boundaries by Previous Sexual Experience: Results from Logistic Regression Analyses
| Boundary | OR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Any Opportunity | ||
| VS | 9.59 | 3.58–25.67 |
| OS | 0.66 | 0.15–2.91 |
| BOTH | 5.89 | 2.96–11.73 |
| At a Certain Age | ||
| VS | 0.58 | 0.13–2.54 |
| OS | 3.22 | 1.70–6.08 |
| BOTH | 0.17 | 0.47–1.19 |
| Feel Mature to Handle Consequences | ||
| VS | 0.47 | 0.19–1.12 |
| OS | 0.60 | 0.34–1.08 |
| BOTH | 0.34 | 0.20–0.58 |
| Attractive Partner | ||
| VS | 1.58 | 0.59–4.18 |
| OS | 1.66 | 0.86–3.20 |
| BOTH | 2.54 | 1.49–4.33 |
| Length of Relationship | ||
| VS | 1.81 | 0.58–5.63 |
| OS | 3.21 | 1.61–6.39 |
| BOTH | 2.67 | 1.43–4.96 |
| Committed Relationship | ||
| VS | 1.07 | 0.44–2.57 |
| OS | 3.26 | 1.76–6.05 |
| BOTH | 1.76 | 1.07–2.89 |
| Trust of Partner | ||
| VS | 1.22 | 0.52–2.90 |
| OS | 3.77 | 1.94–7.30 |
| BOTH | 2.14 | 1.28–3.57 |
| Partner and I are in Love | ||
| VS | 0.60 | 0.24–1.51 |
| OS | 2.12 | 1.17–3.84 |
| BOTH | 1.39 | 0.85–2.28 |
| I was Married | ||
| VS | 0.38 | 0.15–0.92 |
| OS | 0.43 | 0.24–0.78 |
| Both | 0.34 | 0.20–0.56 |
| Will not get in Trouble | ||
| VS | 1.64 | 0.64–4.16 |
| OS | 1.66 | 0.88–3.11 |
| BOTH | 1.59 | 0.92–2.74 |
| No one would find out | ||
| VS | 0.54 | 0.12–2.37 |
| OS | 1.93 | 0.98–3.80 |
| BOTH | 1.41 | 0.76–2.63 |
| Safer Sex Method is Available | ||
| VS | 0.48 | 0.17–1.34 |
| OS | 1.36 | 0.76–2.43 |
| BOTH | 1.05 | 0.63–1.74 |
Note. OR = Odds Ratio, OS = Oral sex and VS = vaginal sex. No previous sexual experience is the reference category. OR’s in bold are significant values.