Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 3;35(3):1018–1030. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22231

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Dice coefficient results calculated between language maps derived from resting‐state and task‐based language fMRIs. Results of paired t‐test indicate that compared to the whole brain measurement, the putative language ROIs Dice measurement indicates higher overlap between resting‐state language component maps and “task t‐map” (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001 for “RefLC” and “ConLC” respectively). Compared to “RefLC”, “ConLC” has higher Dice coefficient (within language ROI) with “task t‐map” (P < 0.05).