Skip to main content
. 2013 May 15;98(1):189–196. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.051508

TABLE 3.

Multiple linear regression analysis of SSB consumption (g/d) and dietary sodium intake (390 mg/d) in consumers of SSBs by age group and sex: NHANES 2005–2008 (n = 4443)1

Age group
2–5 y
6–11 y
12–18 y
Model Total (n = 4443) M (n = 508) F (n = 435) M (n = 718) F (n = 733) M (n = 1077) F (n = 972)
2a
 β (95% CI), P 45 (27, 63), <0.001 6 (−2, 15), 0.12 27 (8, 47), <0.01 27 (12, 41), <0.01 30 (18, 43), <0.001 45 (15, 75), <0.01 14 (2, 27), <0.05
R2 0.12, <0.001 0.004, 0.12 0.04, <0.01 0.04, <0.01 0.07, <0.001 0.10, <0.01 0.02, <0.05
2b
 β (95% CI), P 32 (13, 50), P < 0.001 25 (11, 38), <0.01 34 (9, 59), <0.05 40 (18, 62), <0.001 46 (32, 60), <0.001 38 (6, 70), <0.05 −0.4 (−21, 19), 0.10
R2 0.21, <0.001 0.03, <0.05 0.07, <0.05 0.07, <0.05 0.11, <0.001 0.11, <0.05 0.04, 0.07
1

In all models, the dependent variable was SSB consumption (g/d), and the independent variable was sodium intake (390 mg/d). Model 2a was unadjusted. Model 2b was adjusted for age, sex, race-ethnic group, socioeconomic status, and energy derived from sources other than SSBs (kcal/d). Age and sex were not adjusted for in the stratified models. For R2 values, the second value in each cell represents the F test of the overall signficance of the regression model. SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage.