Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2013 Mar;16(1):35–58. doi: 10.1007/s10567-012-0125-8

Table 2.

Studies in Early and Middle Childhood to Early Adolescent Samples

1st
Author(s)
Year Sample Female
N
Age Behavior Assessed
(Reporter)
Childhood
Onset
Modeling
Adol:
Child
Onset
M/F
Separate
(Y/N)
Trajectories/Groups n (%)
Côté et al. 2001 2/3 community,
1/3 high risk
-Quebec, public
school sample
-Mostly White
-1/3 had high
disruptive
behaviors at age 5
885 6-12 Disruptive behavior
(SBQa items–
Teacher)
Semi-
parametric
modeling
N/A Y 1. High 12 (1.4%)
2. Medium-High 85 (9.6%)
3. Medium 280 (31.6%)
4. Low 508 (57.4%)
Broidy et
al.
2003 Community
-Quebec sample,
representative
-Middle class
1000 6-12 Physical
Aggression
(3 itemsb
Teacher)
Semi-
parametric
modeling
N/A Y 1. High stable 30 (3%)
2. High desisting 120 (12%)
3. Low stable 330 (33%)
4. Very low stable 520 (52%)
Community
-New Zealand
birth cohort
(Christchurch)
630 7-13 Physical
Aggression
(3 itemsc
Teacher)
Semi-
parametric
modeling
N/A Y 1. High stable 63 (10%)
2. Low stable 302 (48%)
3. Very low stable 265 (42%)
Community
-New Zealand
birth cohort
(Dunedin)
502 7-13 Physical
Aggression
(2 itemsd
Teacher)
Semi-
parametric
modeling
N/A Y 1. Moderate desisting 216 (43%)
2. Very low stable 286 (57%)
Community
-Child
Development
Project
-19% Minority
281 5-12 Physical
Aggression
(4 itemse
Teacher)
Semi-
parametric
modeling
N/A Y 1. High stable 28 (10%)
2. Low stable 124 (44%)
3. Very low stable 129 (46%)
Harachi
et al.
2006 Community
-U.S. Northwest
-81% Caucasian
-7% Asian/Pacific
Islander
461 7-13 Aggressive
Behavior
(Itemsa from
TOCA, CBCL –
Teacher)
Semi-
parametric
modeling
N/A Y 1. High 48 (10.4%)
2. Moderate 62 (13.4%)
3. Low 147 (31.9%)
4. None 204 (44.3%)
Fontaine
et al.
2008 2/3 community,
1/3 high risk
-Quebec, public
school sample
-Mostly White
-1/3 had high
disruptive
behaviors at age 5
881 6-12 Physical
Aggression
(SBQ – Teacher)
Semi-
parametric
modeling
N/A Y 1. High declining 79 (8.9%)
2. Moderate 409 (46.4%)
3. None 393 (44.6%)
Joussemet
et al.
2008 Community
-Quebec sample,
representative
-Race/ethnicity
not given
-Middle class
996 6-12 Physical
Aggression
(SBQ –Teacher)
Semi-
parametric
modeling
N/A N 1. High 10 (1%)
2. Moderate 70 (7%)
3. Low 438 (44%)
4. Never 478 (48%)
Barker &
Maughan
2009 Community
-Avon, England
-96% Caucasian
3537 4-13 Conduct Problems
(SDQb – Parent)
Growth
mixture
modeling
1.5:1 N 1. Early-onset persistent 292(8.3%)
2.Childhood Limited 499 (14.1%)
3. Adolescent onset 417 (11.8%)
4. Low 2327 (65.8%)
Campbell
et al.
2010 Community
-NICHD
-Multi-site
-24% Minority
-Mid/upper SESc
533 6-12 Aggressive
Behavior
(TRF – Teacher)
Semi-
parametric
modeling
N/A Y 1. High variable 24 (4.5%)
2. Low Stable 81 (15.2%)
3. No aggression 428 (80.3%)
a

SBQ = Social Behavior Questionnaire (Tremblay et al., 1991).

b

Fights with others, bullies/intimidates others, kicks/bites/hits others.

c

Frequently fights with other children,bullies other children, temper outbursts.

d

Frequently fights with other children, bullies other children.

e

Cruelty/bullying/meanness to others, fights with others, physically attacks people, threatens people.

a

Fights, is cruel or mean to others, threatens people, yells at others.

b

SDQ = Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman, 2001).

c

SES = Socioeconomic status.