Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2013 Mar;16(1):35–58. doi: 10.1007/s10567-012-0125-8

Table 3.

Studies from Early and Middle Childhood into Adolescence

1st
Author(s)
Year Sample Female
N
Age Behavior Assessed
(Reporter)
Childhood
Onset
Modeling
Adol:
Child
Onset
M/F
Separate
(Y/N)
Trajectories/Groups n (%)
Middle Childhood to Adolescence
Maughan
et al.
2000 Community
-89% White
-Rural
-Southeast U.S.
-1/3 below Federal
poverty line
630 9-13
through
13-16
DSM-IV
Aggressive
CD Symptoms
(Child, Parent)
Semi-
parametric
modeling
N/A N 1. High stable 15 (2.3%)
2. Declining 63 (10%)
3. Stable low 552 (87.7%)
DSM-IV Non-
Aggressive
CD Symptoms
(Child, Parent)
N/A N 1. High stable 12 (1.9%)
2. Declining 164 (26%)
3. Stable low 454 (72.1%)
Fergusson
&
Horwood
2002 Community
-New Zealand
birth cohort
(Christchurch)
461 8-20 Conduct Problems
(Parent, Teacher
(8-10))a
Juvenile Offending
(SREDb, SRDc
Parent, Child (11-
20))
Latent class
modeling
13:1 N 1. Chronic 8 (2.1%)
2. Early adolescent limited (21%)
3. Adolescent limited (3.7%)
4. Late adolescent limited (2.4%)
5. Low 327 (71%)
Odgers et
al.
2008 Community
-New Zealand
birth
cohort (Dunedin)
-Primarily White
494 7-15 DSM-IV CD
symptoms (6)d
(Parent, Child,
Teacher)
General
growth
mixture
modeling
2:1 Y 1. Early-onset persistent 37 (7.5%)
2. Childhood limited 99 (20%)
3. Adolescent onset 86 (17.4%)
4. Low 272 (55.1%)
Middle Childhood to Adolescence (cont’d)
Pepler et
al.
2010 Community
-Canadian school
sample
-20.4% Asian-
Canadian
-Mid-to-upper SES
402 10-17 Delinquency
(SRED – Child)
Semi-
parametric
modeling
1:1.5 N 1. Early onset 17 (4.2%)
2. Late onset 11 (2.7%)
3. Moderate 92 (22.9%)
4. Low 282 (70.2%)
Diamont-
opoulou
et al.
2011 Community
-Dutch
-Wave design
-no race/SES
provided
776 11-18 Delinquency
(YSRa – Child)
General
growth mixture
modeling
N/A Y 1. “High” increasing 264 (34%)
*did not differ from 0 at age 11
2. Low 512 (66%)
Early Childhood to Adolescence
Moffitt &
Caspi
2001 Community
-New Zealand birth
cohort
-Primarily White
445 5-18 Antisocial behavior
(Parent (5-11)
SRD – Child (15,
18))
LCP defined as
> 2 time points
5-11 with
ASB,
extreme ASB
at 15 or 18
13:1 Y 1. Life-course persistent 6 (1%)
2. Adolescent limited 78 (18%)
3. Never 361 (81%)
Brennan
et al.
2003 High-risk
-Australian birth
cohort subsample
-Mothers
depressed 0-5
-91% Caucasian
172 5,14,15 Aggressive
Behavior
(CBCL – Parent)
Combinations
of 1 SD above
mean at age 4,
14, or 15; those
in “middle
range”
excluded
1:1 Y 1. Early onset persistent 23
(13.4%)
2. Adolescent onset 25 (14.3%)
3. Nonaggressive 124 (72.3%)
Early Childhood to Adolescence (cont’d)
Bongers et
al.
2004 Community
-Netherlands birth
cohorts
-Wave design
-Caucasian
1060 4-18 Aggression
(CBCL – Parent)
Multi-level
growth models
N/A N 1. High decreasing 47 (4.4%)
2. Low decreasing 154 (14.5%)
3. Low 859 (81%)
Opposition
(CBCL –Parent)
1:1 N 1. High persisting 63 (5.9%)
2. High decreasing 234 (22.1%)
3.Medium decreasing 335 (31.6%)
4. Adolescent increasing 73 (6.9%)
5. Low decreasing 272 (25.7%)
6. Low (7.8%)
Property Violations
(CBCL –Parent)
Multi-level
growth models
N/A N 1. High persisting 33 (3.1%)
2. Low decreasing 184 (17.4%)
3. Low 843 (79.7%)
Status Violations
(CBCL – Parent)
37:1 N 1. High increasing 7 (.7%)
2. Adolescent increasing 258
(24.3%)
3. Medium increasing 204 (19.2%)
4. Low 591 (55.8%)
Lahey et
al.
2006 Community
-U.S.
Representative,
NLSY subsample
-Diverse sample
-Accelerated
design
2253 4-17 Conduct Problems
(Items from
CBCLa–Parent (4-
13))
Delinquency
(SRD – Child,
(14-17))
Semi-
parametric
modeling
1.5:1 Y 1. Life-course persistent 155(6.9%)
2. Moderate 622 (27.6%)
3. Normative 834 (37%)
4. Adolescent limited 257 (11.4%)
5. Low 385 (17.1%)
Bor et al. 2010 Community
-Australian
birth cohort
-Mostly Caucasian
-Working and
lower-middle class
2201 5,14 Antisocial Behavior
(CBCL – Parent,
age 5; YSR – Child
age 14)
Considered

antisocial
at a given age
if scored 1 SD
> mean
4:1 Y 1. Life-course persistent 41 (2.7%)
2. Childhood limited 166 (9.7%)
3. Adolescent onset 154 (10.1%)
4. Unclassified 1291 (77.5%)
a

Measure created for study –items from Conners’ (1969) and Rutters’ (1970) scales.

b

SRED = Self-Report of Early Delinquency (Moffitt & Silva, 1988).

c

SRD = Self-Report of Delinquency.

d

Truancy, stealing, fighting, telling lies, bullying, and destroying property.

a

YSR = Youth Self Report Version of the CBCL (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001).

a

Cheats or tells lies, has trouble getting along with teachers, disobedient at home, disobedient at school, bullies or is cruel or mean to others, breaks things on purpose or deliberately destroys his/her own or another’s things, and does not seem to feel sorry after misbehaving.