Table 3.
1st Author(s) |
Year | Sample | Female N |
Age | Behavior Assessed (Reporter) |
Childhood Onset Modeling |
Adol: Child Onset |
M/F Separate (Y/N) |
Trajectories/Groups n (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Middle Childhood to Adolescence | |||||||||
Maughan et al. |
2000 |
Community -89% White -Rural -Southeast U.S. -1/3 below Federal poverty line |
630 | 9-13 through 13-16 |
DSM-IV Aggressive CD Symptoms (Child, Parent) |
Semi- parametric modeling |
N/A | N | 1. High stable 15 (2.3%) 2. Declining 63 (10%) 3. Stable low 552 (87.7%) |
DSM-IV Non- Aggressive CD Symptoms (Child, Parent) |
“ | N/A | N | 1. High stable 12 (1.9%) 2. Declining 164 (26%) 3. Stable low 454 (72.1%) |
|||||
Fergusson & Horwood |
2002 |
Community -New Zealand birth cohort (Christchurch) |
461 | 8-20 | Conduct Problems (Parent, Teacher (8-10))a Juvenile Offending (SREDb, SRDc – Parent, Child (11- 20)) |
Latent class modeling |
13:1 | N | 1. Chronic 8 (2.1%) 2. Early adolescent limited (21%) 3. Adolescent limited (3.7%) 4. Late adolescent limited (2.4%) 5. Low 327 (71%) |
Odgers et al. |
2008 |
Community -New Zealand birth cohort (Dunedin) -Primarily White |
494 | 7-15 | DSM-IV CD symptoms (6)d (Parent, Child, Teacher) |
General growth mixture modeling |
2:1 | Y | 1. Early-onset persistent 37 (7.5%) 2. Childhood limited 99 (20%) 3. Adolescent onset 86 (17.4%) 4. Low 272 (55.1%) |
Middle Childhood to Adolescence (cont’d) | |||||||||
Pepler et al. |
2010 |
Community -Canadian school sample -20.4% Asian- Canadian -Mid-to-upper SES |
402 | 10-17 | Delinquency (SRED – Child) |
Semi- parametric modeling |
1:1.5 | N | 1. Early onset 17 (4.2%) 2. Late onset 11 (2.7%) 3. Moderate 92 (22.9%) 4. Low 282 (70.2%) |
Diamont- opoulou et al. |
2011 |
Community -Dutch -Wave design -no race/SES provided |
776 | 11-18 | Delinquency (YSRa – Child) |
General growth mixture modeling |
N/A | Y | 1. “High” increasing 264 (34%) *did not differ from 0 at age 11 2. Low 512 (66%) |
Early Childhood to Adolescence | |||||||||
Moffitt & Caspi |
2001 |
Community -New Zealand birth cohort -Primarily White |
445 | 5-18 | Antisocial behavior (Parent (5-11) SRD – Child (15, 18)) |
LCP defined as > 2 time points 5-11 with ASB, extreme ASB at 15 or 18 |
13:1 | Y | 1. Life-course persistent 6 (1%) 2. Adolescent limited 78 (18%) 3. Never 361 (81%) |
Brennan et al. |
2003 |
High-risk -Australian birth cohort subsample -Mothers depressed 0-5 -91% Caucasian |
172 | 5,14,15 | Aggressive Behavior (CBCL – Parent) |
Combinations of 1 SD above mean at age 4, 14, or 15; those in “middle range” excluded |
1:1 | Y | 1. Early onset persistent 23 (13.4%) 2. Adolescent onset 25 (14.3%) 3. Nonaggressive 124 (72.3%) |
Early Childhood to Adolescence (cont’d) | |||||||||
Bongers et al. |
2004 |
Community -Netherlands birth cohorts -Wave design -Caucasian |
1060 | 4-18 | Aggression (CBCL – Parent) |
Multi-level growth models |
N/A | N | 1. High decreasing 47 (4.4%) 2. Low decreasing 154 (14.5%) 3. Low 859 (81%) |
Opposition (CBCL –Parent) |
“ | 1:1 | N | 1. High persisting 63 (5.9%) 2. High decreasing 234 (22.1%) 3.Medium decreasing 335 (31.6%) 4. Adolescent increasing 73 (6.9%) 5. Low decreasing 272 (25.7%) 6. Low (7.8%) |
|||||
Property Violations (CBCL –Parent) |
Multi-level growth models |
N/A | N | 1. High persisting 33 (3.1%) 2. Low decreasing 184 (17.4%) 3. Low 843 (79.7%) |
|||||
Status Violations (CBCL – Parent) |
“ | 37:1 | N | 1. High increasing 7 (.7%) 2. Adolescent increasing 258 (24.3%) 3. Medium increasing 204 (19.2%) 4. Low 591 (55.8%) |
|||||
Lahey et al. |
2006 |
Community -U.S. Representative, NLSY subsample -Diverse sample -Accelerated design |
2253 | 4-17 | Conduct Problems (Items from CBCLa–Parent (4- 13)) Delinquency (SRD – Child, (14-17)) |
Semi- parametric modeling |
1.5:1 | Y | 1. Life-course persistent 155(6.9%) 2. Moderate 622 (27.6%) 3. Normative 834 (37%) 4. Adolescent limited 257 (11.4%) 5. Low 385 (17.1%) |
Bor et al. | 2010 |
Community -Australian birth cohort -Mostly Caucasian -Working and lower-middle class |
2201 | 5,14 | Antisocial Behavior (CBCL – Parent, age 5; YSR – Child age 14) |
Considered antisocial at a given age if scored 1 SD > mean |
4:1 | Y | 1. Life-course persistent 41 (2.7%) 2. Childhood limited 166 (9.7%) 3. Adolescent onset 154 (10.1%) 4. Unclassified 1291 (77.5%) |
Measure created for study –items from Conners’ (1969) and Rutters’ (1970) scales.
SRED = Self-Report of Early Delinquency (Moffitt & Silva, 1988).
SRD = Self-Report of Delinquency.
Truancy, stealing, fighting, telling lies, bullying, and destroying property.
YSR = Youth Self Report Version of the CBCL (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001).
Cheats or tells lies, has trouble getting along with teachers, disobedient at home, disobedient at school, bullies or is cruel or mean to others, breaks things on purpose or deliberately destroys his/her own or another’s things, and does not seem to feel sorry after misbehaving.