Table 3.
Parameters | Weeks | Placebo (n=46) | Herbal blend (n=49) | Net reductiona,b | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction in body weight (kg) | 2 | 0.8±0.1 | 2.0±0.1 | 1.3 (1.6%) | <.0001* |
4 | 0.9±0.1 | 3.1±0.2 | 2.3 (2.8%) | <.0001* | |
8 | 1.5±0.2 | 5.2±0.3 | 3.8 (4.6%) | <.0001* | |
Reduction in BMI (kg/m2) | 2 | 0.3±0.1 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.5 (1.5%) | <.0001* |
4 | 0.4±0.1 | 1.3±0.1 | 0.9 (2.7%) | <.0001* | |
8 | 0.6±0.1 | 2.2±0.1 | 1.6 (4.6%) | <.0001* | |
Reduction in waist circumference (cm) | 2 | 0.6±0.6 | 4.2±0.5 | 3.5 (3.6%) | <.0001* |
4 | 4.0±0.7 | 7.7±0.7 | 3.7 (3.7%) | <.0001* | |
8 | 6.0±0.8 | 11.9±0.7 | 5.9 (6.0%) | <.0001* | |
Reduction in hip circumference (cm) | 2 | 0.9±0.5 | 2.6±0.4 | 1.6 (1.4%) | .01* |
4 | 1.2±0.5 | 3.5±0.5 | 2.3 (2.0%) | .002* | |
8 | 3.1±0.6 | 6.3±0.5 | 3.2 (2.7%) | .0001* | |
Reduction in waist to hip ratio | 2 | 0.0±0.01 | 0.02±0.01 | 0.02 (2.3%) | .02* |
4 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.01 (1.2%) | .1 | |
8 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.06±0.01 | 0.03 (3.5%) | .00* |
Values represent mean±SEM.
Significant difference between the herbal blend and placebo group.
Net reduction=herbal blend minus placebo.
Numbers in parentheses represent the % net reduction from baseline for the herbal group.