Table 4.
ROC Analyses to Examine Optimal Thresholds for the Social-Communication Criteria.
| A1 (10 ADI-R, ADOS) | A2 (12 ADI-R, ADOS) | A3 (3 ADI-R) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cutoff | Sensitivity | Specificity | Sensitivity | Specificity | Sensitivity | Specificity | 
| -1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 
| 0.5 | 1 | 0.029 | 1 | 0.014 | 0.951 | 0.348 | 
| 1.5 | 1 | 0.087 | 1 | 0.123 | 0.873 | 0.558 | 
| 2.5 | 0.996 | 0.196 | 0.996 | 0.225 | 0.725 | 0.746 | 
| 3.5 | 0.993 | 0.304 | 0.986 | 0.377 | 0.577 | 0.891 | 
| 4.5 | 0.989 | 0.42 | 0.979 | 0.507 | 0.363 | 0.971 | 
| 5.5 | 0.982 | 0.5 | 0.958 | 0.609 | 0.092 | 0.978 | 
| 6.5 | 0.965 | 0.601 | 0.944 | 0.652 | 0 | 1 | 
| 7.5 | 0.947 | 0.674 | 0.908 | 0.761 | ||
| 8.5 | 0.919 | 0.783 | 0.88 | 0.804 | ||
| 9.5 | 0.884 | 0.862 | 0.852 | 0.891 | ||
| 10.5 | 0.835 | 0.899 | 0.782 | 0.92 | ||
| 11.5 | 0.764 | 0.942 | 0.711 | 0.949 | ||
| 12.5 | 0.68 | 0.957 | 0.637 | 0.971 | ||
| 13.5 | 0.623 | 0.957 | 0.56 | 0.986 | ||
| 14.5 | 0.539 | 0.964 | 0.511 | 0.993 | ||
| 15.5 | 0.426 | 0.978 | 0.384 | 0.993 | ||
| 16.5 | 0.313 | 0.978 | 0.296 | 0.993 | ||
| 17.5 | 0.229 | 0.986 | 0.246 | 0.993 | ||
| 18.5 | 0.144 | 1 | 0.162 | 1 | ||
| 19.5 | 0.046 | 1 | 0.106 | 1 | ||
| 20.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.056 | 1 | ||
| 21.5 | 0.028 | 1 | ||||
| 22.5 | 0.011 | 1 | ||||
| 23.5 | 0 | 1 | ||||
Note. Shading indicates the optimal cutoff balancing sens and spec.