Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2012 Feb 6;27(3):728–741. doi: 10.1037/a0026967

Table 1.

Description of Principal Respondents and Core Network Members

Variable Principal
N = 152
Core Network Members
N = 180
Means and Standard Deviations
Age 58.31 (5.42) 50.61 (14.86)
Education 13.88 (2.20) 13.41 (2.69)
Self-rated health 3.64 (1.09) 3.77 (0.91)
Stress appraisal 4.31 (0.83)
Positive quality
 Positive regard 4.95 (0.16) 4.86 (0.41)
 Perceived support 4.67 (0.40) 4.50 (0.61)
 Circle # 1.25 (0.53) 1.27 (0.53)
Negative quality 2.04 (1.18) 2.20 (1.19)
Enacted support
 Emotional 4.21 (0.85) 4.38 (0.80)
 Instrumental 3.18 (1.12) 3.46 (0.99)
Proportions
Women .63 .64
Race
 White .72 .75
 Black .26 .23
Married .63 .62
Life event type
 Interpersonal .55 -
 Noninterpersonal .45 -
Relationship type
 Spouse/partner .39 -
 Other family .38 -
 Friend/other .23 -

Note. Physical health was rated from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). Appraised stress was rated from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). Positive regard, perceived support and negative quality were rated from 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree). Circle number included 1 (inner, closest), 2 (middle, closer), and 3 (outer, close). Enacted support was rated from 1 (not at all) to 5 (a great deal).