. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2012 Feb 6;27(3):728–741. doi: 10.1037/a0026967

Table 3.

Percentages of Principal and Core Network Member Dyads with Perfect Agreement or Disagreement (PR > CNM; PR < CNM) Regarding Relationship Quality and Support

	Principal–Core Network 1			Principal–Core Network 2
	Perfect Agreement	P > CNM	P < CNM	Perfect Agreement	P > CNM	P < CNM
Positive regard (%)	72.9	17.1	10.0	72.3	14.9	12.8
Perceived support (%)	31.4	38.6	30.0	19.1	40.4	40.4
Closeness (%)	79.4	8.8	11.8	61.8	14.5	23.6
Negative quality (%)	25.9	32.1	42.0	33.9	23.2	42.9
Enacted Emotional support (%)	46.0	20.0	34.0	32.5	33.8	33.8
Enacted Instrumental support (%)	15.2	31.3	53.5	12.5	36.3	51.2