Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2012 Feb 6;27(3):728–741. doi: 10.1037/a0026967

Table 4.

Multilevel Models examining Enacted Emotional Support as a Function of Relationship Quality and Stress Appraisal Interactions

Predictor Model 1
B (SE)
Model 2
B (SE)
Model 3
B (SE)
Model 4
B (SE)
Intercept 6.05 (0.58) 6.03 (0.58) 5.63 (0.61) 5.43 (0.55)
Positive regard 0.55 (0.16)**
Perceived support 0.33(0.11)**
Closeness −0.15 (0.11)
Negative quality −0.02 (0.05)
Stress appraisals 0.11 (0.06) 0.11 (0.06) 0.07 (0.06) 0.11 (0.06)*
Stress X Positive regard −0.58 (0.24)*
Stress X Perceived support −0.29 (0.13)*
Stress X Closeness 0.12 (0.13)
Stress X Negative quality 0.10 (0.06)
Gender 0.20 (0.10)* 0.21 (0.10)* 0.18 (0.10) 0.28 (0.09)**
Age −0.03 (0.01)** −0.03 (0.01)** −0.02 (0.01) −0.02 (0.01)*
Race 0.02 (0.11) 0.02 (0.11) 0.02 (0.12) 0.04 (0.10)
Education −0.04 (0.02) −0.04 (0.02) −0.04 (0.02) −0.04 (0.02)
Self-rated health 0.00 (0.04) 0.01 (0.04) 0.00 (0.05) 0.00 (0.04)
Type of event 0.05 (0.09) 0.05 (0.09) 0.00 (0.10) 0.09 (0.09)
Spouse/romantic 0.04 (0.13) 0.03 (0.13) 0.01 (0.14) 0.11 (0.12)
Other family 0.03 (0.13) 0.03 (0.13) −0.05 (0.14) 0.09 (0.12)
Friend/other - - - -
Dyad membership 0.17 (0.08)* 0.17 (0.08)* 0.26 (0.08)** 0.14 (0.07)
Covariance parameters
Between Networks 0.00 (0.04) 0.00 (0.04) 0.04 (0.04) 0.01 (0.04)
Between Dyads in Networks 0.19 (0.12) 0.26 (0.11)* 0.19 (0.14) 0.23 (0.12)*
Within Dyad 0.39 (0.11)** 0.34 (0.09)** 0.39 (0.12)** 0.36 (0.10)**
Pseudo R2 .73 .82 .80 .84
−2 log likelihood 772.3 773.5 825.3 896.9

Note.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

p < .10