Table 4.
Multilevel Models examining Enacted Emotional Support as a Function of Relationship Quality and Stress Appraisal Interactions
| Predictor | Model 1 B (SE) |
Model 2 B (SE) |
Model 3 B (SE) |
Model 4 B (SE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 6.05 (0.58) | 6.03 (0.58) | 5.63 (0.61) | 5.43 (0.55) |
| Positive regard | 0.55 (0.16)** | |||
| Perceived support | 0.33(0.11)** | |||
| Closeness | −0.15 (0.11) | |||
| Negative quality | −0.02 (0.05) | |||
| Stress appraisals | 0.11 (0.06)† | 0.11 (0.06) | 0.07 (0.06) | 0.11 (0.06)* |
| Stress X Positive regard | −0.58 (0.24)* | |||
| Stress X Perceived support | −0.29 (0.13)* | |||
| Stress X Closeness | 0.12 (0.13) | |||
| Stress X Negative quality | 0.10 (0.06)† | |||
| Gender | 0.20 (0.10)* | 0.21 (0.10)* | 0.18 (0.10)† | 0.28 (0.09)** |
| Age | −0.03 (0.01)** | −0.03 (0.01)** | −0.02 (0.01)† | −0.02 (0.01)* |
| Race | 0.02 (0.11) | 0.02 (0.11) | 0.02 (0.12) | 0.04 (0.10) |
| Education | −0.04 (0.02) | −0.04 (0.02) | −0.04 (0.02) | −0.04 (0.02)† |
| Self-rated health | 0.00 (0.04) | 0.01 (0.04) | 0.00 (0.05) | 0.00 (0.04) |
| Type of event | 0.05 (0.09) | 0.05 (0.09) | 0.00 (0.10) | 0.09 (0.09) |
| Spouse/romantic | 0.04 (0.13) | 0.03 (0.13) | 0.01 (0.14) | 0.11 (0.12) |
| Other family | 0.03 (0.13) | 0.03 (0.13) | −0.05 (0.14) | 0.09 (0.12) |
| Friend/other | - | - | - | - |
| Dyad membership | 0.17 (0.08)* | 0.17 (0.08)* | 0.26 (0.08)** | 0.14 (0.07)† |
| Covariance parameters | ||||
| Between Networks | 0.00 (0.04) | 0.00 (0.04) | 0.04 (0.04) | 0.01 (0.04) |
| Between Dyads in Networks | 0.19 (0.12) | 0.26 (0.11)* | 0.19 (0.14) | 0.23 (0.12)* |
| Within Dyad | 0.39 (0.11)** | 0.34 (0.09)** | 0.39 (0.12)** | 0.36 (0.10)** |
| Pseudo R2 | .73 | .82 | .80 | .84 |
| −2 log likelihood | 772.3 | 773.5 | 825.3 | 896.9 |
Note.
p < .05,
p < .01,
p < .10