. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2012 Feb 6;27(3):728–741. doi: 10.1037/a0026967

Table 5.

Multilevel Models examining Enacted Instrumental Support as a Function of Relationship Quality and Stress Appraisal Interactions

Predictor	Model 1 B (SE)	Model 2 B (SE)	Model 3 B (SE)	Model 4 B (SE)
Intercept	4.00 (0.81)^**	4.00 (0.81)^**	4.24 (0.89)^**	3.60 (0.79)^**
Positive regard	0.22 (0.20)
Perceived support		0.25 (0.13)^†
Closeness			−0.24 (0.13)^†
Negative quality				−0.09 (0.05)^†
Stress appraisals	0.20 (0.08)^*	0.20 (0.08)^*	0.23 (0.09)^**	0.22 (0.08)^**
Stress X Pos. regard	−0.59 (0.30)^*
Stress X Perceived support.		−0.46 (0.16)^**
Stress X Closeness			0.37 (0.15)^*
Stress X Negative quality				0.11 (0.07)
Gender	0.15 (0.13)	0.15 (0.13)	0.11 (0.15)	0.17 (0.13)
Age	−0.01 (0.01)	−0.01 (0.01)	−0.01 (0.01)	0.00 (0.01)
Race	−0.22 (0.15)	−0.22 (0.15)	−0.41 (0.17)^*	−0.21 (0.15)
Education	0.01 (0.03)	0.01 (0.03)	0.00 (0.03)	0.02 (0.03)
Self-rated health	−0.16 (0.06)^**	−0.16 (0.06)^**	−0.15 (0.07)^*	−0.17 (0.06)^**
Type of event	−0.02 (0.13)	−0.02 (0.13)	−0.11 (0.14)	−0.01 (0.13)
Spouse/romantic	0.24 (0.18)	0.25 (0.18)	0.33 (0.20)	0.33 (0.17)^†
Other family	0.01 (0.18)	0.01 (0.18)	0.06 (0.21)	0.05 (0.17)
Friend/other	-	-	-	-
Dyad membership	0.21 (0.11)^*	0.23 (0.10)^*	0.38 (0.10)^**	0.22 (0.10)^*
Covariance parameters
Between Network	0.12 (0.07)^†	0.13 (0.07)^*	0.33 (0.08)^**	0.19 (0.06)^**
Within Dyad	0.88 (0.09)^**	0.86 (0.08)^**	0.72 (0.07)^**	0.82 (0.07)^**
Pseudo R²	.34	.36	.58	.43
−2 log likelihood	957.3	951.1	985.1	1089.3

Note.

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^†

p < .10