Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011 Mar 24;35(7):1119–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.03.008

Table 3.

Effects of Head Start compared to other specific types of care arrangements

Head Start vs.
Parental
Head Start vs.
Pre-kindergarten
Head Start vs.
Other center-based
Head Start vs.
Other non-parental
Parenting
        Low parental warmth 0.44*
(−2.23)
0.79
(−0.81)
0.82
(−0.56)
0.61
(−0.76)
        Parental harshness 0.58
(−1.55)
1.41
(1.36)
1.04
(0.15)
0.81
(−0.38)
        Child’s low access to learning 0.46*
(−2.17)
0.39**
(−3.20)
0.35**
(−2.93)
0.27*
(−2.38)
Child Maltreatment
        Spanking 0.54*
(−2.18)
0.93
(−0.42)
0.62*
(−2.25)
0.58+
(−1.66)
        Other physical assault 0.55+
(−1.67)
1.06
(0.14)
1.06
(0.20)
0.79
(−0.58)
        Neglect 1.03
(0.07)
1.19
(0.58)
0.45**
(−3.97)
0.30*
(−2.11)
        CPS contact 0.55*
(−2.01)
0.75
(−0.66)
0.88
(−0.22)
1.22
(0.36)

Notes: The results were from propensity score matching analyses (i.e., Model 5 in Table 2), which were conducted separately in sub-samples consisting of Head Start participants and children who received one of other specific care arrangements. The sample sizes were 622 for Head Start vs. exclusively parental care, 700 for Head Start vs. pre-kindergarten, 724 for Head Start vs. other center-based care, and 656 for Head Start vs. other non-parental care. Odd ratios with z-statistics (clustered at city level) in parentheses

**

p<0.01

*

p<0.05

+

p<0.10