Table 1. Model performance for GAM models considering different prevalence levels.
Prevalence | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity |
10% | 0.947±0.019 | 0.922±0.029 | 0.889±0.041 |
30% | 0.944±0.017 | 0.926±0.037 | 0.872±0.041 |
50% | 0.945±0.021 | 0.946±0.036 | 0.864±0.044 |
70% | 0.943±0.019 | 0.930±0.027 | 0.875±0.044 |
90% | 0.918±0.025 | 0.912±0.043 | 0.826±0.057 |
Median | 0.944±0.003 | 0.953±0.011 | 0.843±0.001 |
Performance is shown in terms of classification rate (AUC, sensitivity and specificity). Sensitivity and specificity correspond to those calculated using the MST threshold; the validation set used here represents 20% of the data (the other 80% was used to calibrate the models).