Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 17;8(6):e66445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066445

Table 2. Model performance for different statistical models.

Prevalence AUC Sensitivity Specificity
GAM 0.945±0.021 0.946±0.036 0.864±0.044
GLM 0.822±0.033 0.825±0.072 0.820±0.075
BRT 0.933±0.023 0.934±0.046 0.816±0.077
CART 0.900±0.031 0.892±0.040 0.862±0.044
BIOCLIM 0.869±0.034 0.834±0.077 0.787±0.056
DOMAIN 0.847±0.031 0.825±0.062 0.728±0.078
MAHAL 0.854±0.028 0.824±0.056 0.746±0.037
MAXENT 0.952±0.006 0.942±0.024 0.865±0.015
Median 0.956±0.003 0.956±0.001 0.849±0.001

When the model allows changing species prevalence (i.e. GAM, GLM, BRT, CART), a prevalence of 50% was used in model weights. Performance is shown in terms of classification rate (AUC, sensitivity and specificity). Sensitivity and specificity correspond to those calculated using the MST threshold; the validation set used here represents 20% of the data (the other 80% was used to calibrate the models).